Audi TT MOT Results

Registered in 2008
78.1% pass rate
from 6,882 tests in 2017
(41% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi TT is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.4% fail on Suspension (37% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Coil springs (43% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (42% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Location
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.015% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.5% fail on Drive shafts (25% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Front drive shafts (24% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (25% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.044% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.62% fail on Shock absorbers (53% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings (80% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Front (70% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Rear (88% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.087% fail on Condition
    • 0.044% fail on Suspension arms (98% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (99% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment
    • 0.044% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.044% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.015% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.015% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.015% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment
    • 0.015% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.015% fail on Component mounting
  • 7.4% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (60% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps (36% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front lamps (54% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.029% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (63% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp (72% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Direction indicators (46% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Flashing type (46% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Individual lamps (51% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.015% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.87% fail on Headlamps (72% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.12% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plate lamp (84% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.39% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.044% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.044% fail on Horn (85% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Battery (89% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.015% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 5.4% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth (26% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.087% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.015% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes (63% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components (53% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (51% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake discs (80% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance (65% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Rear wheels (55% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Front wheels (78% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake imbalance (64% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance (92% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.044% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.015% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.17% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems (90% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Components (95% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Pipes (97% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Hoses (87% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Leaks
      • 0.015% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.10% fail on ABS (72% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.073% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.044% fail on Parking brake (92% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Condition (92% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.015% fail on Warning
  • 2.3% fail on Driver's view of the road (61% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Wipers (76% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.015% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.015% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.55% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (81% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Emissions (64% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Exhaust system (88% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Emissions not tested (79% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Fuel system (88% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Hose
      • 0.015% fail on System
  • 0.51% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (45% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.42% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.015% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.087% fail on Seat belts (79% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment
  • 0.51% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.51% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.35% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (44% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers front (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Drivers
      • 0.015% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.058% fail on Seats
      • 0.029% fail on Passengers
      • 0.029% fail on Drivers
    • 0.029% fail on Body condition (83% better than other 2008 cars)
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels (49% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.058% fail on Condition
  • 0.15% fail on Steering (91% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Steering system (93% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.029% fail on Free play
        • 0.029% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.029% fail on Steering rack (88% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.015% fail on Power steering
      • 0.015% fail on Electronic power steering
Read the Honest John Review

  • Audi TT Roadster (2007 - 2015)
    As sharp a drive as the coupe version. Eye-catching looks and nice design details in the cabin. Good range of engines including economical TDI. Very few reported problems until emissions defeat scandal broke.
  • Audi TT (2006 - 2014)
    Enjoyable to drive. Nicely detailed cabin. Impressive engines. Frugal TDI available. TTS is a great performance car. Very few reported problems over seven years.

    Search Good Garages