Audi TT MOT Results
Registered in 199950.8% pass rate
from 1,047 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi TT is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(15% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
(70% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 10% fail on Front lamps (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.19% fail on All position lamps
- 9.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (57% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp (44% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
(32 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp levelling device (55 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (37 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (32 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Headlamp levelling device (92 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.7% fail on Battery
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.96% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.48% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.38% fail on Individual lamps (79% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.5% fail on
Hazard warning
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.76% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.19% fail on Horn
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
(70% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
23% fail on
Suspension
-
8.1% fail on
Coil springs
(190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(82% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(85% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (87% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(85% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(55% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (55% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
- 0.096% fail on Condition
-
5.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Condition
- 0.096% fail on Attachment
- 0.096% fail on Linkage condition
- 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
0.96% fail on
Macpherson strut
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.67% fail on Front
- 0.19% fail on Rear (83% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.29% fail on
Prescribed areas
(95% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Component mounting (96% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.19% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.19% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Coil springs
(190% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
5.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.6% fail on
Components
- 3.8% fail on Pipes
- 0.86% fail on Hoses
- 0.86% fail on Leaks
- 0.29% fail on Operation
-
4.6% fail on
Components
-
5.0% fail on
Brake performance
(48% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (38% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Rear wheels (50% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Front wheels (88% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.19% fail on Brake operation
- 0.096% fail on Brake imbalance
- 4.6% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Hub components
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
- 0.96% fail on Brake discs
- 0.67% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Electronic stability system (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
0.19% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.19% fail on
Pedal
- 0.19% fail on Condition
-
0.19% fail on
Pedal
-
0.096% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.096% fail on Lever
-
0.096% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.096% fail on
Components
- 0.096% fail on Pipes
-
0.096% fail on
Components
-
5.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(30% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Tread depth
- 4.8% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Size/type
- 0.096% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
- 0.096% fail on Valve stem
-
9.6% fail on
Steering
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Steering system
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Ball joint
- 0.38% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.096% fail on
Free play
- 0.096% fail on Steering rack
-
0.48% fail on
Power steering
- 0.38% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.19% fail on Operation
- 0.096% fail on Pump
- 0.096% fail on Other components
- 0.19% fail on Steering operation
-
9.2% fail on
Steering system
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 3.2% fail on Washers
- 0.67% fail on Windscreen
- 0.096% fail on Mirrors
-
6.9% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(40% better than other 1999 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Emissions (32% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Exhaust system (59% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.57% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.38% fail on Cap
- 0.096% fail on Hose
- 0.096% fail on System
-
3.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(37% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 2.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.29% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.67% fail on
Seat belts
(82% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas (91% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Requirements
-
2.8% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
1.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(71% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Doors
- 0.57% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Passengers front
- 0.19% fail on Body condition (91% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Seats
- 0.19% fail on Passengers
- 0.096% fail on Speedometer
- 0.096% fail on Body security
-
0.76% fail on
Doors
-
1.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate
-
0.57% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Attachment