Audi TT MOT Results

Registered in 1999
50.8% pass rate
from 1,047 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi TT is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (15% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (70% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 10% fail on Front lamps (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.19% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (57% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (44% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (32 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Headlamp levelling device (55 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (37 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (32 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Headlamp levelling device (92 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Battery
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.96% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.48% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.38% fail on Individual lamps (79% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Hazard warning (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.76% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Horn
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 8.1% fail on Coil springs (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Drive shafts (82% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Front drive shafts (85% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 7.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (87% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Suspension arms (55% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (55% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment
      • 0.096% fail on Condition
    • 5.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Condition
      • 0.096% fail on Attachment
      • 0.096% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.96% fail on Macpherson strut (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.67% fail on Front
      • 0.19% fail on Rear (83% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas (95% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Component mounting (96% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.19% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 5.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.6% fail on Components
        • 3.8% fail on Pipes
        • 0.86% fail on Hoses
      • 0.86% fail on Leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Operation
    • 5.0% fail on Brake performance (48% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (38% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels (50% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Front wheels (88% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.19% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.096% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 4.6% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.96% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.67% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Electronic stability system (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
        • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.096% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.096% fail on Lever
    • 0.096% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.096% fail on Components
        • 0.096% fail on Pipes
  • 11% fail on Tyres (30% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
    • 0.096% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.096% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.6% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Steering system (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.38% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Free play
        • 0.096% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.48% fail on Power steering
      • 0.38% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
      • 0.096% fail on Pump
      • 0.096% fail on Other components
    • 0.19% fail on Steering operation
  • 8.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.67% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.096% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (40% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Emissions (32% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust system (59% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.57% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.38% fail on Cap
      • 0.096% fail on Hose
      • 0.096% fail on System
  • 3.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (37% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.29% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.67% fail on Seat belts (82% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas (91% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Requirements
  • 1.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (71% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Doors
      • 0.57% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.19% fail on Body condition (91% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Seats
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers
    • 0.096% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.096% fail on Body security
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.57% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages