MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Audi » TT » 1999

Audi TT MOT Results

Registered in 1999
56.2% pass rate
from 870 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi TT is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Matched pair
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps (59% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.46% fail on All position lamps (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.34% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.92% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.23% fail on Horn
    • 0.57% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.57% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.57% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 6.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (55% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.5% fail on Springs (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Coil springs (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Coil spring (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.23% fail on Wheel bearings (84% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.11% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.11% fail on Levelling valve
    • 0.11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 5.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Electronic stability control (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Brake performance (39% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.92% fail on Rbt
          • 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.46% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (83% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance (87% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (64% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.34% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.11% fail on Cable
        • 0.11% fail on Lever
        • 0.11% fail on Linkage
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.46% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.34% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.34% fail on Pedal
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.11% fail on Servos
  • 8.6% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Steering linkage components (95% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.9% fail on Steering gear (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Steering rack (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Power steering
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
      • 0.23% fail on Rams (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Pump
    • 0.23% fail on Steering play
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.11% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.11% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (29% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Transmission
      • 4.7% fail on Drive shafts (50% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Joints
        • 0.11% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system (69% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Doors
      • 0.46% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.57% fail on Undertray (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.34% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.34% fail on Seats
      • 0.34% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.23% fail on Body
      • 0.11% fail on Panel
      • 0.11% fail on Other body component
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.46% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.46% fail on Size/type
  • 5.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (36% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (40% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Spark ignition (39% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (35% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.46% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.23% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.11% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.92% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.92% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (44% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.34% fail on Airbags
      • 0.34% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages