Audi RS6 MOT Results
Registered in 200373.2% pass rate
from 127 tests in 2020
(39% better than other 2003 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi RS6 is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(38% better than other 2003 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Headlamps
(17% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp (4.5% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(23% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (14% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(70% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(70% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(70% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.79% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.79% fail on Horn
-
6.3% fail on
Headlamps
(17% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Brakes
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Brake performance
(38% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
(20% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (34% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.79% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(61% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.79% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.79% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.79% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.79% fail on
Decelerometer
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
(20% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(51% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(24% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads (24% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.79% fail on Brake discs
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(24% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
4.7% fail on
Brake performance
(38% better than other 2003 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Suspension
(44% better than other 2003 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(19% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Ball joint (9.2% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.79% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.79% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
0.79% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.79% fail on Ball joint
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(19% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(33% better than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Transmission
(37% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(44% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Joints (46% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(44% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.79% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.79% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.79% fail on
Doors
-
0.79% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.79% fail on Door condition
-
0.79% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.79% fail on Door condition
-
0.79% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
4.7% fail on
Transmission
(37% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(28% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(23% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(11% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (22% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (48% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (61% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.79% fail on Catalytic converter
-
5.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(11% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.79% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
5.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(23% better than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Visibility
(41% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Washers (30% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Wipers (64% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.79% fail on Windscreen
-
3.9% fail on
Steering
(12% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(19% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Track rod end (4.8% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Locking devices
-
0.79% fail on
Steering play
- 0.79% fail on Steering rack
-
3.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(19% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Tyres
(53% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth (62% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(83% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Registration plates (84% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Road Wheels
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.79% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp