Audi Q7 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
87.9% pass rate
from 5,425 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi Q7 is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.0% fail on Tyres (41% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Condition (80% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.055% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.018% fail on Size/type
  • 2.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.26% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.17% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.055% fail on All direction indicators (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Headlamp (91% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.037% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.074% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.018% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.018% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 1.4% fail on Brakes (31% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.15% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.15% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.17% fail on Brake performance (61% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.055% fail on Service brake performance (76% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.055% fail on Rbt (76% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.037% fail on Service brake performance (79% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.018% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.018% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.018% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.018% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.018% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.018% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
    • 0.055% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.055% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.018% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.018% fail on Servos
    • 0.018% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.018% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.018% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.018% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.018% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.018% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.018% fail on Other components
  • 1.1% fail on Visibility (63% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Washers (50% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Wipers (79% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.037% fail on View to rear
      • 0.037% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.018% fail on Driver's view
  • 0.83% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.018% fail on Airbags
      • 0.018% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.53% fail on Suspension
    • 0.41% fail on Springs (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Coil springs (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Coil spring (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.018% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.018% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.018% fail on Pipes
  • 0.39% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.33% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.29% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Spark ignition (80% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.037% fail on Noise suppression (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.018% fail on Undertray
    • 0.018% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.018% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.074% fail on Body
      • 0.074% fail on Other body component
    • 0.055% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.037% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.018% fail on Tank
      • 0.018% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.018% fail on Transmission
      • 0.018% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.018% fail on Joints
    • 0.018% fail on Doors
      • 0.018% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.018% fail on Door condition
    • 0.018% fail on Seats
      • 0.018% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.018% fail on Undertray
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
  • 0.018% fail on Steering
    • 0.018% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.018% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review

  • Audi Q7 (2015 on)
    Quiet and refined, ideal long distance motorway cruiser, beautifully finished quality interior, seven seats and a huge boot, five Star Euro NCAP rating., six Isofix points.

    Search Good Garages