MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Audi » Q7 » 2010

Audi Q7 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
78.5% pass rate
from 1,618 tests in 2021
(40% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi Q7 is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.062% fail on Size/type
  • 5.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Direction indicators (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Flashing type (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.12% fail on Stop lamp (96% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.12% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.062% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.062% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 4.4% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (76% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.062% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (87% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.062% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.062% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.062% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Brake linings and pads (70% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Brake pads (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.062% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.062% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.37% fail on Lever
    • 0.37% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.31% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.19% fail on Rigid brake pipes (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.062% fail on Pedal
      • 0.062% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.062% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.062% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 4.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.062% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.6% fail on Suspension (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.062% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.062% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.062% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.12% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Operation
      • 0.062% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.062% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.062% fail on Springs
      • 0.062% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.062% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.062% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.062% fail on Anti-roll bar
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.80% fail on Spark ignition (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.062% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.19% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.062% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.062% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.062% fail on Undertray
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.56% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.25% fail on Steering linkage components (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.062% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.25% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Other components
    • 0.19% fail on Steering play
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.99% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.62% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment
    • 0.37% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.99% fail on Road Wheels (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Attachment (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Condition
  • 0.74% fail on Body, chassis, structure (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Transmission (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Drive shafts (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Joints (71% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.12% fail on Exhaust system (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Body
      • 0.062% fail on Other body component
    • 0.062% fail on Seats
      • 0.062% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.37% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages