Audi Q7 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
79.4% pass rate
from 1,744 tests in 2020
(39% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi Q7 is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.92% fail on Headlamps (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Headlamp (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.80% fail on Direction indicators (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Flashing type (56% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.11% fail on Side repeaters (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.057% fail on Switch
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Position lamp (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.17% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.057% fail on Stop lamp
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (37% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.57% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt (86% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance (88% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.057% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt
          • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.057% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.057% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.057% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake linings and pads (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Brake pads (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.63% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.40% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.34% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.17% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.17% fail on Lever
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.057% fail on Pedal
      • 0.057% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.11% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.057% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.97% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.92% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.057% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.057% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.057% fail on Undertray
    • 0.057% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.057% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.6% fail on Visibility (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.86% fail on Wipers (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on View to rear
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.057% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.057% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.057% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.057% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.4% fail on Suspension (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (37% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.057% fail on Axles
      • 0.057% fail on Axle
    • 0.057% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.057% fail on Springs
      • 0.057% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.057% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.057% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.057% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.97% fail on Body, chassis, structure (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Transmission (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Prop shaft (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
      • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Belts
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
        • 0.057% fail on Catch
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.057% fail on Pipe
      • 0.057% fail on System
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.057% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.057% fail on Body
      • 0.057% fail on Other body component
    • 0.057% fail on Seats
      • 0.057% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.057% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.057% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.69% fail on Steering (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.40% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.17% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Other components
        • 0.057% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.057% fail on Power steering
      • 0.057% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.057% fail on Steering play
      • 0.057% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.57% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.40% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.57% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.46% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages