MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Audi » Q7 » 2009

Audi Q7 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
73.8% pass rate
from 1,426 tests in 2021
(32% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi Q7 is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (33% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (41% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.070% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Direction indicators (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Flashing type (89% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.070% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.070% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.21% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.070% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.070% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Condition (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.070% fail on Size/type
  • 5.8% fail on Brakes (34% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.91% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.77% fail on Rbt
          • 0.56% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.070% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.070% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.070% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.070% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.070% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake linings and pads (55% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Brake pads (59% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.49% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.49% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.070% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.070% fail on Cable
    • 0.77% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.70% fail on Lever
      • 0.070% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.70% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.49% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.35% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
    • 0.35% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.070% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.070% fail on Brake fluid
  • 4.3% fail on Suspension (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Ball joint (53% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.28% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Operation (47 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Springs (98% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Coil spring (98% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.070% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility (37% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.84% fail on Washers (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.21% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.21% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (34% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (38% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.84% fail on Spark ignition (69% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.28% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Transmission (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.98% fail on Joints
    • 0.14% fail on Exhaust system (93% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Body
      • 0.070% fail on Panel
      • 0.070% fail on Other body component
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.070% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.070% fail on Door condition
      • 0.070% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.070% fail on Door condition
    • 0.070% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.070% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.070% fail on Seats
      • 0.070% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Attachment (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Condition
  • 0.98% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.49% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.70% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.70% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.63% fail on Steering (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.28% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.070% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.070% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.070% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages