Audi Q5 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
84.7% pass rate
from 3,436 tests in 2017
(48% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi Q5 is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.6% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (23% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.70% fail on Headlamp (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Headlamp levelling device (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.67% fail on Direction indicators (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Flashing type (56% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.029% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.55% fail on Registration plate lamp (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Position lamps (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Front lamps (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear lamps (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Stop lamp (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Horn
    • 0.029% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.029% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.029% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.029% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.087% fail on Size/type
    • 0.058% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 2.8% fail on Suspension (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front drive shafts (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Suspension arms (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment
    • 0.38% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.17% fail on Front
    • 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Front suspension joints (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.029% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.029% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.029% fail on Linkage condition
  • 2.3% fail on Driver's view of the road (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Wipers (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.058% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.7% fail on Brakes (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Brake discs (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.29% fail on Components
        • 0.26% fail on Hoses (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Pipes
      • 0.029% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Brake performance (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.029% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.029% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.029% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.029% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 0.87% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.087% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.058% fail on Cap
      • 0.029% fail on System
    • 0.029% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.55% fail on Steering (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Steering system (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Free play (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.087% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.029% fail on Other components
        • 0.029% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.029% fail on Steering control
      • 0.029% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.029% fail on Power steering
      • 0.029% fail on Pump
  • 0.52% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.29% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.087% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.058% fail on Drivers
      • 0.058% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.087% fail on Body condition
    • 0.029% fail on Load security
      • 0.029% fail on Bootlid
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
  • 0.12% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.058% fail on Seat belts (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Audi Q5 (2008 - 2017)
    Refined and practical. Impressive rear passenger space and decent boot. Good economy from 2.0 TDI. Chain cam 2.0 TFSI. Smooth long distance comfort.

    Search Good Garages