Audi Q3 MOT Results
Registered in 201791.0% pass rate
from 16,525 tests in 2021
(35% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi Q3 is unusually good or bad.
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.018% fail on Size/type
-
1.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(36% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Headlamp aim
(45% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Headlamps
(39% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Headlamp (93% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.21% fail on Stop lamp (38% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.18% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.18% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.18% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.18% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.048% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.018% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.18% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.11% fail on
Reversing lamps
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.054% fail on Horn
- 0.024% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.024% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.012% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.012% fail on Position lamp
- 0.0061% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.72% fail on
Headlamp aim
(45% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Brakes
(47% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(45% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(65% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Brake pads (66% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Brake linings
-
0.43% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.42% fail on Brake discs
- 0.012% fail on Brake drums (20 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(65% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Brake performance
(28% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.012% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.0061% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0061% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
-
0.061% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.036% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.018% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.018% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.018% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0061% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.0061% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.036% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.061% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.061% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.042% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.024% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.024% fail on
Rbt
- 0.024% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.024% fail on
Rbt
-
0.19% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.042% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.042% fail on Electronic parking brake (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.030% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.0061% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.0061% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.012% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.80% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(45% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Visibility
(72% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Washers (27% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Wipers (90% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.073% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0061% fail on Window
- 0.024% fail on Bonnet
-
0.018% fail on
View to rear
- 0.018% fail on Mirrors
-
0.77% fail on
Suspension
-
0.30% fail on
Springs
-
0.30% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.30% fail on Coil spring
- 0.0061% fail on Mounting
-
0.30% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.22% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes (67% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.0061% fail on Ball joint
- 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(73% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Linkage
- 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joints (81% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0061% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.0061% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.0061% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.0061% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0061% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.0061% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0061% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.30% fail on
Springs
-
0.33% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(40% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(41% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.16% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.067% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.0061% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.079% fail on
Compression ignition
(63% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.012% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.012% fail on Undertray
-
0.0061% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.0061% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.31% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(41% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.10% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.079% fail on Condition
- 0.024% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.19% fail on Registration plates
-
0.054% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(82% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Transmission
(82% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Bumpers
- 0.0061% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.0061% fail on
Body
- 0.0061% fail on Other body component
-
0.0061% fail on
Doors
-
0.0061% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.0061% fail on Door condition
-
0.0061% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.0061% fail on Undertray
-
0.018% fail on
Transmission
(82% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Steering
(76% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Steering linkage components
(82% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.0061% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.0061% fail on Steering rack
-
0.018% fail on
Steering linkage components
(82% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.030% fail on
Road Wheels
(81% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Attachment (77% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Audi Q3 (2011 - 2018)
Stylish, compact SUV. Impressive fuel economy. Two and four-wheel drive available.