Audi Q2 MOT Results
Registered in 201792.2% pass rate
from 12,237 tests in 2021
(43% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi Q2 is unusually good or bad.
-
3.0% fail on
Tyres
- 1.7% fail on Condition
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth
- 0.016% fail on Size/type
-
1.6% fail on
Brakes
(25% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(21% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(37% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Brake pads (37% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.47% fail on Brake discs
-
0.78% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(37% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.38% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.37% fail on
Rbt
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.082% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.0082% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0082% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.37% fail on
Rbt
-
0.049% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.041% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.025% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.016% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0082% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.041% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.016% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.38% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.025% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.016% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0082% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.025% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.016% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.0082% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.016% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.0082% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0082% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.0082% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.0082% fail on Other components
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(21% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(54% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Headlamp aim
(30% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.16% fail on
Headlamps
(69% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp (67% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.041% fail on
Direction indicators
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Flashing type
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Side repeaters (87% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.041% fail on
Flashing type
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Stop lamp (90% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.033% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.033% fail on Horn
-
0.025% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.025% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.0082% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.0082% fail on Position lamp
-
0.0082% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.0082% fail on Switch
-
0.91% fail on
Headlamp aim
(30% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
Visibility
(74% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Washers (36% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Wipers (89% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.025% fail on Windscreen
-
0.20% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(64% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(66% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Spark ignition
(58% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.057% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (71% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.049% fail on
Compression ignition
(77% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.13% fail on
Spark ignition
(58% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0082% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.0082% fail on Undertray
-
0.0082% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.0082% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.18% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(66% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.090% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.082% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.082% fail on Condition
-
0.16% fail on
Suspension
(81% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.025% fail on
Suspension arms
(89% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0082% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.0082% fail on
Springs
-
0.0082% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.0082% fail on Coil spring
-
0.0082% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.0082% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.0082% fail on Linkage
-
0.13% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.13% fail on Registration plates
-
0.098% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(68% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Transmission
-
0.033% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.033% fail on Joints
-
0.033% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.025% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.016% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.0082% fail on Tank
- 0.016% fail on Bumpers
-
0.016% fail on
Doors
-
0.016% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.016% fail on Door condition
-
0.016% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.0082% fail on
Body
- 0.0082% fail on Other body component
-
0.033% fail on
Transmission
-
0.041% fail on
Road Wheels
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Attachment
-
0.033% fail on
Steering
(78% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Track rod end (82% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0082% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.0082% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0082% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.016% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2017 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Audi Q2 (2016 on)
Feels like a high quality car with user-friendly tech. Scope for personalisation. Good sized boot. Works surprisingly well with 1.0 TFSI engine.