Audi Cabriolet MOT Results

Registered in 1998
54.4% pass rate
from 228 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi Cabriolet is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Drive shafts (98% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Front drive shafts (100% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 8.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (100% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment
    • 6.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.88% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.88% fail on Rear
    • 0.44% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.1% fail on Fog lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps (77% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Front lamps (79% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.44% fail on Horn
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.6% fail on Components
        • 6.1% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Pipes
      • 0.88% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Leaks
    • 6.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake discs (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.3% fail on ABS
    • 0.88% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.88% fail on Pedal
        • 0.88% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.0% fail on Emissions
    • 4.4% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on System (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pipe (8 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 5.7% fail on Condition
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
  • 4.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
  • 2.6% fail on Steering
    • 2.2% fail on Steering system
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.88% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.44% fail on Power steering
      • 0.44% fail on Pump
  • 2.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.8% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Drivers (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Speedometer
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (69% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.44% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages