Audi Cabriolet MOT Results
Registered in 199663.8% pass rate
from 163 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi Cabriolet is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(140% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Flashing type
(140% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.2% fail on All direction indicators (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
-
6.1% fail on
Flashing type
(140% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp
-
3.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
- 1.2% fail on Horn
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.61% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.61% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.61% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.61% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
6.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(140% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
12% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
- 7.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 3.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.61% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.61% fail on Catalytic converter
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.61% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.61% fail on Other leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
8.0% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.61% fail on Joints
-
7.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
-
1.2% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 1.2% fail on Door condition
-
1.2% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
8.0% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Visibility
- 3.7% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers
-
4.9% fail on
Brakes
(56% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
0.61% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.61% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.8% fail on
Brake performance
(74% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.61% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.61% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.61% fail on
Pressure storage reservoirs
- 0.61% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
-
0.61% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.61% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
1.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.9% fail on
Steering
-
3.1% fail on
Steering gear
- 3.1% fail on Steering rack
-
1.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.8% fail on Track rod end
-
3.1% fail on
Steering gear
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension
(65% better than other 1996 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.61% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.61% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.61% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.61% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.5% fail on
Suspension arms
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.61% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Tyres
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on Tread depth
-
0.61% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.61% fail on Registration plates