Audi Cabriolet MOT Results

Registered in 1994

64.2% pass rate

from 109 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi Cabriolet is unusually good or bad.

18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (84% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 11% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 11% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    - 11% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.8% fail on Fuel system
  - 2.8% fail on Pipe (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Body
  - 0.92% fail on Panel
- 0.92% fail on Doors
  - 0.92% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.92% fail on Door condition
- 0.92% fail on Seats
  - 0.92% fail on Driver's seat
17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.5% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 2.8% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 2.8% fail on Horn
- 4.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 4.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 4.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.92% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.7% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.92% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.8% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (10 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.92% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.92% fail on Headlamps
  - 0.92% fail on Headlamp
- 0.92% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.92% fail on Switch
10% fail on Suspension
- 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
  - 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.92% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.92% fail on Ball joint
- 2.8% fail on Macpherson strut (20 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes (37 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.92% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (19 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.92% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.92% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.92% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.92% fail on Pins and bushes
10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 10% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 10% fail on Spark ignition
    - 6.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 1.8% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    - 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
9.2% fail on Visibility
- 6.4% fail on Wipers
- 6.4% fail on Washers
- 0.92% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.92% fail on Windscreen
8.3% fail on Brakes
- 3.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 3.7% fail on Brake discs and drums (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    - 3.7% fail on Brake discs (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  - 0.92% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.92% fail on Brake pads
- 3.7% fail on Brake performance
  - 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.7% fail on Rbt
      - 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.92% fail on Rbt
      - 0.92% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 0.92% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.92% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.92% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.92% fail on Load sensing valves
- 0.92% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
  - 0.92% fail on Other components
3.7% fail on Steering
- 2.8% fail on Steering gear
  - 2.8% fail on Steering rack
- 0.92% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.92% fail on Track rod end
1.8% fail on Tyres
- 0.92% fail on Condition
- 0.92% fail on Tread depth
0.92% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.92% fail on Registration plates