MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Audi » A4 » 2002

Audi A4 MOT Results

Registered in 2002
55.9% pass rate
from 4,771 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi A4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (9.4% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim (19% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (21% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators (49% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type (49% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Side repeaters (44% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.021% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.021% fail on Switch
    • 0.46% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Position lamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical equipment (76% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Horn (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.021% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.021% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.13% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.021% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.021% fail on Switch
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 9.9% fail on Suspension arms (80% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Pins and bushes (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Ball joint (91% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (42% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.88% fail on Pins and bushes (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Linkage (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.063% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (95% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Springs
      • 3.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.1% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.021% fail on Mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers (58% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.34% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.042% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (84% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.34% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.042% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.021% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (95% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Macpherson strut (86% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.021% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 7.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.17% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.021% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (26% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (27% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (36% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.042% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.042% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.042% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.042% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.042% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.042% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.021% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.021% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (41% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (41% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance (35% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance (43% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (28% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads (28% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.38% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.34% fail on Cable (96% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Lever
        • 0.021% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.96% fail on Flexible brake hoses (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Air and vacuum systems (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Servos (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Operation
      • 0.021% fail on Leaks
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (59% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
      • 0.042% fail on Hand lever (84% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.021% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Servos (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.021% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake control (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Lever (60% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres (25% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth (28% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.54% fail on Size/type (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility (21% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers (22% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (30% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.31% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.27% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.063% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (39% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Transmission (36% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts (37% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Joints (37% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints
        • 0.042% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust system (70% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Panel (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Other body component (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.44% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.063% fail on Tank
      • 0.021% fail on Hose
      • 0.021% fail on System
    • 0.50% fail on Seats (76% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.38% fail on Doors (46% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
      • 0.10% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.084% fail on Door condition
        • 0.021% fail on Hinge
      • 0.084% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.084% fail on Door condition
    • 0.19% fail on Undertray (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.17% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.10% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.10% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.084% fail on Chassis (87% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Chassis condition (87% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Load security (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Tailgate (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Tailgate condition (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Access panel
    • 0.063% fail on Integral vehicle structure (94% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (96% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.021% fail on Towbar
      • 0.021% fail on Towbar condition
  • 5.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (21% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (24% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.063% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.021% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.021% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
          • 0.021% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.042% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.021% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 2.5% fail on Spark ignition (58% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (35% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Catalyst emissions (75% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested (65% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.063% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.021% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.042% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.75% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.69% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.084% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.021% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.063% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.063% fail on Undertray
  • 3.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.63% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.61% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.021% fail on Operation
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Operation
      • 0.042% fail on Other components
    • 0.13% fail on Steering play
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.042% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (51% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Seat belts (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Condition
      • 0.10% fail on Requirements
      • 0.063% fail on Prescribed areas (96% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Attachment
    • 0.063% fail on Airbags
      • 0.042% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.021% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.94% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.92% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.021% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.61% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.50% fail on Attachment (78% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 0.021% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.021% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages