Audi A4 MOT Results
Registered in 199554.0% pass rate
from 339 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi A4 is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Suspension
(53% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
12% fail on
Suspension arms
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
9.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
(120% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Front
- 3.5% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.2% fail on Condition
-
2.7% fail on
Coil springs
(140% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.59% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.29% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.29% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.29% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
12% fail on
Suspension arms
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.4% fail on Front lamps
- 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.88% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp
-
0.29% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.29% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 3.2% fail on Battery
- 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.1% fail on Horn
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.59% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.29% fail on Electrical wiring
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
8.6% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.4% fail on Front wheels
- 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
-
3.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
3.2% fail on
Components
- 2.7% fail on Hoses
- 1.2% fail on Pipes
- 0.29% fail on Operation
-
3.2% fail on
Components
-
3.2% fail on
Hub components
- 2.1% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.59% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.29% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.29% fail on Cable
-
0.29% fail on
Full power hydraulic systems
- 0.29% fail on Warning
-
0.29% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.29% fail on
Components
- 0.29% fail on Hoses
-
0.29% fail on
Components
- 0.29% fail on ABS
- 0.29% fail on Restricted movement
-
8.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.8% fail on Emissions
- 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.88% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Cap
- 0.59% fail on System
- 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested
-
9.1% fail on
Steering
(89% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Steering system
(110% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Steering rack
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint
-
1.8% fail on
Power steering
- 0.88% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.59% fail on Other components
- 0.29% fail on Operation
- 0.29% fail on Rams
-
8.3% fail on
Steering system
(110% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.4% fail on Washers
- 0.59% fail on Windscreen
- 0.29% fail on Bonnet
- 0.29% fail on Mirrors
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.29% fail on Size/type
-
2.9% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.7% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
2.7% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(63% better than other 1995 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
- 0.88% fail on Drivers
- 0.29% fail on Passengers front
- 0.29% fail on Speedometer
-
0.29% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.29% fail on Chassis
-
0.29% fail on
Seats
- 0.29% fail on Drivers
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
-
1.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate
-
0.59% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.59% fail on Attachment