Audi 80 MOT Results
Registered in 199262.2% pass rate
from 98 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi 80 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
6.1% fail on
Rbt
- 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.1% fail on
Rbt
-
5.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
(3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
5.1% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses (13 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.1% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint
-
4.1% fail on
Sub-frames
(5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Sub-frame (20 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.0% fail on
Springs
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.0% fail on Coil spring
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.0% fail on
Macpherson strut
(16 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Macpherson strut
- 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.0% fail on
Axles
- 1.0% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension arms
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
7.1% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.0% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.0% fail on Tank
- 1.0% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 1.0% fail on Bumpers
-
1.0% fail on
Doors
-
1.0% fail on
Driver's door
- 1.0% fail on Door condition
-
1.0% fail on
Driver's door
-
7.1% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
10% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
- 8.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
7.1% fail on
Visibility
- 4.1% fail on Wipers
- 4.1% fail on Washers
-
6.1% fail on
Tyres
- 5.1% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Tread depth
-
3.1% fail on
Steering
-
2.0% fail on
Steering gear
- 2.0% fail on Steering rack
-
1.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.0% fail on Track rod end
-
2.0% fail on
Steering gear