Alfa Romeo Spider MOT Results
Registered in 200872.8% pass rate
from 610 tests in 2021
(32% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Spider is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
9.5% fail on
Springs
(59% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Coil springs
(60% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Coil spring (58% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Mounting
-
9.5% fail on
Coil springs
(60% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.82% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.98% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.49% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.49% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.16% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
9.5% fail on
Springs
(59% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Brakes
-
7.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(87% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
3.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
- 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.98% fail on
Rbt
- 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.33% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.16% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.98% fail on
Rbt
-
0.66% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.33% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(87% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(69% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.49% fail on Brake discs
-
0.33% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(85% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Brake pads (85% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.16% fail on Cable
-
0.49% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.33% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.33% fail on Hand lever
-
0.16% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.16% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.16% fail on Electronic stability control
-
7.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.6% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Condition
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth
-
5.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(62% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamps
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (57% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.66% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.66% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(67% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Headlamp aim (69% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.16% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.16% fail on Position lamp
- 0.16% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamps
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
1.6% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.82% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.66% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.16% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.16% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.16% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
5.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.6% fail on
Visibility
(43% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Washers
- 1.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.16% fail on Bonnet
-
0.16% fail on
View to rear
- 0.16% fail on Mirrors
-
2.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(60% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Doors
-
0.33% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.33% fail on Door condition
-
0.33% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.33% fail on Door condition
-
0.33% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.49% fail on Exhaust system (79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Transmission
(82% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Seats
- 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.16% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.16% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.16% fail on Tank
-
0.16% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.16% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.16% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.16% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.66% fail on
Doors
-
0.66% fail on
Steering
(76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Track rod end (82% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Power steering
- 0.33% fail on Pipes and hoses (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.33% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.16% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.16% fail on Registration plates