MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Alfa Romeo » Spider » 2002

Alfa Romeo Spider MOT Results

Registered in 2002
60.5% pass rate
from 147 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Spider is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 2.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.4% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.68% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.68% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.68% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.68% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.68% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 9.5% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Transmission
      • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.8% fail on Joints
    • 0.68% fail on Doors
      • 0.68% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.68% fail on Door condition
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.68% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.68% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
  • 7.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.68% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.68% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.68% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.68% fail on Switch
    • 0.68% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.68% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.68% fail on Horn
  • 6.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.68% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.68% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.68% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 0.68% fail on Steering
    • 0.68% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.68% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages