Alfa Romeo Spider MOT Results
Registered in 199962.0% pass rate
from 266 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Spider is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Brakes
(63% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.0% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.38% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.38% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.38% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
14% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.5% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.75% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.75% fail on Brake discs
-
0.38% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.38% fail on Brake pads
-
0.38% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.38% fail on Lever
-
0.75% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.1% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.38% fail on Lever
-
0.38% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.38% fail on Valves
- 0.38% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.38% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.38% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
12% fail on
Suspension
-
7.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(81% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.75% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.75% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.38% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.38% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.38% fail on
Springs
-
0.38% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.38% fail on Coil spring
-
0.38% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.38% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint
-
7.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(81% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
- 8.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 3.0% fail on Emissions not tested
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.75% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.38% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.38% fail on Horn
-
4.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.9% fail on
Transmission
-
4.9% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.9% fail on Joints
-
4.9% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.75% fail on
Doors
-
0.75% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.38% fail on Door condition
- 0.38% fail on Hinge
-
0.75% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.38% fail on
Chassis
- 0.38% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.38% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.38% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.38% fail on
Cabs
- 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
-
9.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.38% fail on Condition
-
5.6% fail on
Visibility
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.0% fail on Washers
- 0.38% fail on Bonnet
-
0.38% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.38% fail on Windscreen
-
3.8% fail on
Tyres
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.38% fail on Size/type
-
1.5% fail on
Steering
-
0.75% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.75% fail on Steering rack
-
0.75% fail on
Power steering
- 0.75% fail on Other components
-
0.38% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint
-
0.75% fail on
Steering gear
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates
-
0.75% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.75% fail on Attachment