Alfa Romeo Spider MOT Results
Registered in 199857.4% pass rate
from 256 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Spider is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Brakes
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(73% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 9.8% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.7% fail on Front wheels
- 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.3% fail on
Components
- 2.7% fail on Pipes
- 1.2% fail on Hoses
- 0.78% fail on Reservoirs (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Operation
- 0.39% fail on Leaks
-
4.3% fail on
Components
-
3.5% fail on
Hub components
- 2.0% fail on Brake discs
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 1.6% fail on ABS
-
0.78% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.78% fail on Condition
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(73% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
7.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.0% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Drive shafts
-
4.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 4.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.78% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Drive shafts (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
3.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.7% fail on Component mounting
- 1.2% fail on Subframe mounting
-
2.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.0% fail on
Sub-frames
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Condition
- 0.78% fail on Attachment (15 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.78% fail on Rear
- 0.39% fail on Front
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
0.39% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.39% fail on Condition
-
0.39% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
7.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
18% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.0% fail on Front lamps
- 0.78% fail on All position lamps (8 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.78% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.39% fail on Tell tales
- 0.39% fail on Switch
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp
-
0.39% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.39% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.0% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.39% fail on Tell tale
-
1.6% fail on
Hazard warning
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Lamp (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(62% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 9.8% fail on Wipers (84% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Washers
- 0.39% fail on Bonnet
- 0.39% fail on Mirrors
-
10% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 5.9% fail on Emissions
-
0.78% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.39% fail on Cap
- 0.39% fail on System
- 0.78% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.5% fail on Condition
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.39% fail on Size/type
-
4.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.5% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(140% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Seat belts
(82% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 1998 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(140% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
- 0.78% fail on Drivers
- 0.78% fail on Passengers front
- 0.39% fail on Speedometer
-
0.39% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.39% fail on Chassis
- 0.39% fail on Body condition
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
-
1.6% fail on
Steering
-
1.2% fail on
Steering system
- 0.78% fail on Steering rack
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint
-
0.39% fail on
Power steering
- 0.39% fail on Operation
-
1.2% fail on
Steering system
-
0.78% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.39% fail on Condition
- 0.39% fail on Attachment
-
0.78% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.78% fail on Registration plate