MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Alfa Romeo » Spider » 1997

Alfa Romeo Spider MOT Results

Registered in 1997
57.0% pass rate
from 251 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Spider is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (200% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 9.2% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.80% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.6% fail on Flexible brake hoses (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.40% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.40% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.80% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.40% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.40% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.80% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.40% fail on Lever
    • 0.40% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.40% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.40% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.40% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.80% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.80% fail on Horn
      • 0.40% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.80% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.80% fail on Switch
    • 0.40% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Position lamp
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.2% fail on Springs
      • 0.80% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.40% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.40% fail on Mounting
      • 0.40% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.80% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.40% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.80% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.80% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.40% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.40% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 10.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 10.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.80% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.40% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.80% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.80% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.40% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.40% fail on Undertray
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility
    • 6.4% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.40% fail on View to rear
      • 0.40% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.8% fail on Transmission
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.0% fail on Joints
        • 0.40% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.40% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.40% fail on Joints
    • 0.40% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.40% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.40% fail on Chassis
      • 0.40% fail on Chassis condition
  • 4.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.80% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.4% fail on Tyres
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.80% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.2% fail on Steering
    • 0.80% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.40% fail on Operation
      • 0.40% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.40% fail on Power steering
      • 0.40% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.80% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages