Alfa Romeo Spider MOT Results

Registered in 1996

64.0% pass rate

from 125 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Spider is unusually good or bad.

15% fail on Brakes
- 14% fail on Brake performance (94% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 8.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 8.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 1996 cars)
      - 7.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      - 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 7.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 7.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.2% fail on Rbt
      - 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.80% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.80% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.80% fail on Rbt
      - 0.80% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 2.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 1.6% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.6% fail on Brake discs
- 0.80% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.80% fail on Lever
- 0.80% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.80% fail on Valves
- 0.80% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.80% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.80% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.4% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.4% fail on Headlamp
- 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.6% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.80% fail on All direction indicators
    - 0.80% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.80% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.80% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.80% fail on Switch
- 0.80% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.80% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
  - 0.80% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.80% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.80% fail on Electrical wiring
12% fail on Suspension
- 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
  - 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 1.6% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.80% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.6% fail on Springs
  - 1.6% fail on Coil springs
    - 1.6% fail on Coil spring
- 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.80% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.80% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.80% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.80% fail on Other suspension component
7.2% fail on Visibility
- 5.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.4% fail on Washers
6.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.6% fail on Transmission
  - 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
    - 1.6% fail on Joints
- 0.80% fail on Chassis
  - 0.80% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.80% fail on Floor
- 0.80% fail on Seats
  - 0.80% fail on Driver's seat
5.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 5.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 5.6% fail on Spark ignition
    - 3.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.80% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.80% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.80% fail on Engine oil leaks
4.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.80% fail on Prescribed areas
3.2% fail on Tyres
- 2.4% fail on Tread depth
- 0.80% fail on Condition
1.6% fail on Steering
- 0.80% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.80% fail on Steering rack
- 0.80% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.80% fail on Track rod end