Alfa Romeo Spider MOT Results
Registered in 198961.6% pass rate
from 73 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Spider is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Visibility
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 16% fail on Washers (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Wipers
-
1.4% fail on
View to rear
- 1.4% fail on Mirrors
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
6.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
6.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
5.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp
-
4.1% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(7 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
4.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.7% fail on Horn
- 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
- 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.4% fail on Position lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.4% fail on Switch
-
6.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(190% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Rbt
(190% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
8.2% fail on
Rbt
(190% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
6.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 4.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
-
6.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
- 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
-
8.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(190% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.4% fail on Brake discs
-
1.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.2% fail on
Suspension
- 5.5% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
1.4% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
8.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
2.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.7% fail on
Chassis
- 2.7% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.4% fail on Tank
-
1.4% fail on
Spare wheel
- 1.4% fail on Carrier
-
1.4% fail on
Transmission
-
1.4% fail on
Prop shafts
- 1.4% fail on Prop shaft
-
1.4% fail on
Prop shafts
-
1.4% fail on
Doors
-
1.4% fail on
Driver's door
- 1.4% fail on Door condition
-
1.4% fail on
Driver's door
-
2.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
6.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.1% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 1.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
5.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.4% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
5.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.5% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Registration plates (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
4.1% fail on
Steering
-
2.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.7% fail on Track rod end
- 1.4% fail on Steering wheel
-
2.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts