Alfa Romeo Mito MOT Results
Registered in 201783.0% pass rate
from 765 tests in 2021
(28% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Mito is unusually good or bad.
-
3.9% fail on
Brakes
(89% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(95% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(100% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.65% fail on Brake discs
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(100% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.92% fail on
Service brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.92% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.92% fail on
Service brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Hand lever (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(95% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
-
3.4% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.39% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.26% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Springs
(7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
(7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Coil spring (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
(7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.9% fail on
Springs
(7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Visibility
- 1.7% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Wipers (61% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
View to rear
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors
-
0.65% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.52% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.52% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.26% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.52% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.13% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.52% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.39% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.26% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.13% fail on
Transmission
-
0.13% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.13% fail on Joints
-
0.13% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.26% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.26% fail on Registration plates
-
0.26% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.26% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts