Alfa Romeo Mito MOT Results

Registered in 2016
88.4% pass rate
from 1,573 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Mito is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.064% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.57% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.57% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.19% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.064% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.064% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.064% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.064% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.76% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.64% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.064% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.064% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.064% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.064% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.064% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.064% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.064% fail on Rbt
          • 0.064% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.064% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.064% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 2.0% fail on Visibility
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.64% fail on Wipers (66% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Driver's view
  • 0.45% fail on Suspension
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.13% fail on Springs
      • 0.13% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.13% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.064% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.064% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.064% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.064% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.064% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  • 0.38% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.38% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.32% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.064% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.064% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.064% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.064% fail on Condition
    • 0.064% fail on Attachment
  • 0.064% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.064% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.064% fail on Steering
    • 0.064% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.064% fail on Steering arm
  • 0.064% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.064% fail on Body
      • 0.064% fail on Other body component

Search Good Garages