MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Alfa Romeo » Mito » 2016

Alfa Romeo Mito MOT Results

Registered in 2016
80.1% pass rate
from 1,510 tests in 2021
(26% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Mito is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.9% fail on Brakes (76% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (84% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (84% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads (85% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.066% fail on Cable
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.46% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.066% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.066% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.066% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.066% fail on Lever
    • 0.066% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.066% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.066% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 4.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (64% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (61% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.26% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.066% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.066% fail on Horn
    • 0.066% fail on Stop lamp
  • 4.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.066% fail on View to rear
      • 0.066% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.066% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Suspension
    • 2.2% fail on Springs (91% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Coil springs (91% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Coil spring (92% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.066% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.066% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.066% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.066% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.066% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.066% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.066% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Undertray (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Transmission
      • 0.066% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.066% fail on Joints
    • 0.066% fail on Seats
      • 0.066% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.066% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.066% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
  • 0.13% fail on Steering
    • 0.066% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.066% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.066% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages