MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Alfa Romeo » Mito » 2010

Alfa Romeo Mito MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.6% pass rate
from 3,906 tests in 2017
(28% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Mito is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Location
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.077% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Front
    • 0.77% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.74% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.72% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.026% fail on Couplings
      • 0.026% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.026% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.38% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Front suspension joints (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Suspension arms (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (96% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.026% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (13% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.051% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.026% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.026% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Fog lamp (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.67% fail on Position lamps (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Front lamps (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Rear lamps (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.28% fail on Horn
    • 0.23% fail on Stop lamp (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Direction indicators (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Flashing type (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on Individual lamps (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Battery
    • 0.077% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.077% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 8.4% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Rear wheels (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.41% fail on Brake imbalance (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.077% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Brake pads (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.026% fail on Brake linings
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Mechanical components (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Cable (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake control components (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Components
        • 0.23% fail on Hoses
      • 0.026% fail on Leaks
    • 0.18% fail on ABS
    • 0.10% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.051% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres (21% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Condition (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 7.1% fail on Driver's view of the road (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Washers (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.051% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.026% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Emissions (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Cap
      • 0.051% fail on System
      • 0.026% fail on Pipe
  • 0.74% fail on Steering
    • 0.46% fail on Steering system (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Track rod end (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.026% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.026% fail on Other components
        • 0.026% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.18% fail on Steering operation (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Power steering
      • 0.051% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.051% fail on Operation
  • 0.54% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.33% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers
      • 0.026% fail on Passengers
    • 0.10% fail on Engine mountings (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Doors
      • 0.051% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.026% fail on Drivers
    • 0.026% fail on Body condition
  • 0.20% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.13% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.026% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.051% fail on Seat belts (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.077% fail on Road Wheels (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Condition
    • 0.026% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages