MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Alfa Romeo » Mito » 2010

Alfa Romeo Mito MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.6% pass rate
from 4,399 tests in 2020
(15% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Mito is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Springs (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 9.0% fail on Coil spring (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Mounting
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint dust cover (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.068% fail on Linkage
      • 0.045% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.023% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Suspension arms (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Ball joint dust cover (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.48% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.34% fail on Shock absorbers (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.023% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.023% fail on Sub-frame
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.045% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Switch
      • 0.023% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.023% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 1.1% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.82% fail on Electrical equipment (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Horn
      • 0.25% fail on Electrical wiring (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.52% fail on Stop lamp (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Direction indicators (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Flashing type (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Individual direction indicators (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Position lamps (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Position lamp (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.045% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.023% fail on Daytime running lamps
    • 0.023% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.023% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Brakes (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Brake pads (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Cable (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Lever
    • 5.9% fail on Brake performance (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.023% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.068% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.023% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.091% fail on Plate brake tester (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.045% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.045% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.23% fail on Pedal
      • 0.20% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.41% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.30% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.34% fail on Lever
    • 0.20% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.20% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.068% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Rigid brake pipes (91% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres (17% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.7% fail on Condition (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Washers (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.091% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.091% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.045% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Transmission (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Drive shafts (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Joints (39% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.50% fail on Fuel system (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Seats (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.14% fail on Engine mounting (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Engine mounting condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Undertray
    • 0.045% fail on Body
      • 0.023% fail on Body condition
      • 0.023% fail on Other body component
    • 0.023% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.023% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.023% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.023% fail on Doors
      • 0.023% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.023% fail on Door condition
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.57% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.80% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.41% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.023% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.023% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.16% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.045% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.023% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.023% fail on Undertray
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Steering linkage components (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Track rod end (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.23% fail on Electronic power steering (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.14% fail on Operation (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.091% fail on Power steering
      • 0.091% fail on Operation
    • 0.023% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.023% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.023% fail on Steering play
      • 0.023% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.48% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.48% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.34% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.023% fail on Airbags
      • 0.023% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 0.023% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages