MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Alfa Romeo » Mito » 2010

Alfa Romeo Mito MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.9% pass rate
from 4,051 tests in 2021
(13% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Mito is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 10% fail on Springs (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 10% fail on Coil springs (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 10% fail on Coil spring (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.074% fail on Mounting
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.074% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Suspension arm (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.49% fail on Sub-frames (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Sub-frame (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.099% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.074% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.074% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.049% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.025% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.074% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.025% fail on Axles
      • 0.025% fail on Axle
  • 13% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.049% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.099% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.074% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.074% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.62% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs (93% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.074% fail on Lever
        • 0.025% fail on Linkage
    • 0.72% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.44% fail on Electronic stability control (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.049% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.54% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.32% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.49% fail on Lever
    • 0.27% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.099% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.074% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.025% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.025% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.025% fail on Condition
    • 0.025% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.025% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.025% fail on Other components
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.025% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.025% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.57% fail on Stop lamp (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.20% fail on Horn
      • 0.15% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.099% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Direction indicators (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Flashing type (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters (59% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.099% fail on Individual direction indicators (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.025% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.025% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Condition (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 6.5% fail on Visibility (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Washers (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.17% fail on View to rear
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.099% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.025% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Spark ignition (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.94% fail on Emissions not tested (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.074% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.049% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.049% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.91% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.35% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.30% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (52% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.025% fail on Particulate filter
    • 0.099% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.099% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.074% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.049% fail on Undertray
      • 0.025% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 4.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Transmission (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Drive shafts (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Joints (50% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.37% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Tank
    • 0.27% fail on Engine mounting (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting condition (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Bracket (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.074% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.099% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.099% fail on Sub-frame (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.099% fail on Sub-frame condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Doors
      • 0.049% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.049% fail on Door condition
      • 0.049% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.049% fail on Door condition
    • 0.049% fail on Body
      • 0.049% fail on Panel
    • 0.049% fail on Undertray
    • 0.025% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.025% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (30% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Track rod end (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.30% fail on Electronic power steering (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.074% fail on Steering rack (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Operation
    • 0.099% fail on Power steering
      • 0.074% fail on Operation
      • 0.025% fail on Other components
    • 0.099% fail on Steering play
      • 0.099% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.57% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.32% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
      • 0.099% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 0.025% fail on Condition
  • 0.025% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.025% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages