Alfa Romeo Mito MOT Results

Registered in 2009
59.0% pass rate
from 5,386 tests in 2020
(13% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Mito is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension (20% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Springs (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Coil springs (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Coil spring (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Mounting
    • 5.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (53% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.98% fail on Ball joint dust cover (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.019% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.019% fail on Linkage
      • 0.019% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Suspension arms (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.41% fail on Shock absorbers (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.019% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.037% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.074% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.037% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.019% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.019% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.019% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.019% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.019% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.019% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Brakes (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (31% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.093% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.074% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.019% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.26% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.037% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.037% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.019% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.019% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.019% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.019% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.56% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.54% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.037% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs (84% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.074% fail on Lever
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.45% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.26% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.24% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
    • 0.30% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.17% fail on Rigid brake pipes (78% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.093% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.019% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
      • 0.019% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.037% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.019% fail on Leaks
      • 0.019% fail on Servos
    • 0.019% fail on Pressure storage reservoirs
      • 0.019% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (20% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.019% fail on Matched pair
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (90% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (33% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Switch
    • 0.74% fail on Electrical equipment (72% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Electrical wiring (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Horn
      • 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.54% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Stop lamp (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters (51% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Individual direction indicators (95% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Position lamps (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Position lamp (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.074% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.019% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.019% fail on Switch
    • 0.019% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.019% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres (16% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Condition (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility (23% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.20% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.093% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.093% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.019% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Spark ignition (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.019% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.019% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.95% fail on Compression ignition (36% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (53% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (60% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.037% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.037% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.037% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.037% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.30% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.037% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.037% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.019% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.13% fail on Noise suppression (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Undertray (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 4.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (20% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Transmission (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Drive shafts (62% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Joints (63% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.019% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.019% fail on Joints
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Pipe
    • 0.35% fail on Doors
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Hinge
      • 0.056% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.056% fail on Door condition
    • 0.20% fail on Engine mounting (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Engine mounting condition (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Bracket
    • 0.093% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.093% fail on Undertray
    • 0.074% fail on Body
      • 0.037% fail on Panel
      • 0.019% fail on Body condition
      • 0.019% fail on Other body component
    • 0.074% fail on Seats
      • 0.056% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.019% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.056% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.056% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.019% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.019% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (39% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Steering linkage components (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Track rod end (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.019% fail on Other components
        • 0.019% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.15% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.093% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.056% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Electronic power steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Power steering
      • 0.074% fail on Operation
    • 0.037% fail on Steering coupling (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Universal joint (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.037% fail on Steering play
      • 0.037% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.59% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
      • 0.019% fail on Requirements
    • 0.056% fail on Airbags
      • 0.037% fail on Passengers airbag (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment
    • 0.037% fail on Condition
    • 0.019% fail on Hubs
  • 0.019% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.019% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages