Alfa Romeo Mito MOT Results

Registered in 2009
58.1% pass rate
from 4,790 tests in 2017
(28% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Mito is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 13% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 13% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Location (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Front
    • 0.50% fail on Drive shafts (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Front drive shafts (53% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Constant velocity joints (55% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.021% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.021% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.31% fail on Shock absorbers (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.084% fail on Suspension arms (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (95% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Front suspension joints (88% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 13% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Rear wheels (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.38% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.021% fail on Brake operation
    • 6.4% fail on Hub components (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Brake linings
    • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.35% fail on Components (46% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Hoses (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.021% fail on Pipes
        • 0.021% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.15% fail on Leaks
      • 0.021% fail on Operation
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.23% fail on Mechanical components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Electronic stability system (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
        • 0.21% fail on Anti-slip (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on ABS
    • 0.021% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
      • 0.021% fail on Warning
  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (21% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.021% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.021% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.021% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.021% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (24% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp (97% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Fog lamp (91% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.50% fail on Stop lamp (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Position lamps (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Front lamps (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Horn
    • 0.27% fail on Battery
    • 0.27% fail on Direction indicators (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Flashing type (84% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (69% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Individual lamps (95% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.021% fail on Switch
      • 0.021% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.021% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres (15% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Size/type
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.021% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 7.9% fail on Driver's view of the road (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Washers (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.25% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.021% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Cap (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Pipe
      • 0.021% fail on System
  • 0.96% fail on Steering
    • 0.58% fail on Steering system (45% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.084% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.021% fail on Free play
        • 0.021% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.23% fail on Power steering (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Electronic power steering (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Pump
    • 0.13% fail on Steering operation (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Steering control
      • 0.042% fail on Steering column (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.021% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.92% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Passengers airbag (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.21% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 0.54% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.27% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.021% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.084% fail on Body condition
    • 0.084% fail on Seats
      • 0.063% fail on Passengers
      • 0.021% fail on Drivers
    • 0.042% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.042% fail on Speedometer (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Body security
    • 0.021% fail on Load security
      • 0.021% fail on Tailgate
  • 0.52% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages