Alfa Romeo GTV MOT Results

Registered in 2000

53.2% pass rate

from 250 tests in 2020

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GTV is unusually good or bad.

27% fail on Brakes (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 22% fail on Brake performance (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 19% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 8.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 8.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 5.6% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 4.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.4% fail on Rbt
      - 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.40% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.40% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 2.0% fail on Rbt
      - 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.40% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    - 0.40% fail on Decelerometer
      - 0.40% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 2.0% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.40% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.40% fail on Brake pads
- 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.40% fail on Electronic stability control
- 1.6% fail on Parking brake control
  - 1.6% fail on Lever
- 0.80% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.80% fail on Hand lever
18% fail on Suspension
- 8.0% fail on Suspension arms
  - 3.2% fail on Ball joint
  - 2.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 1.2% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.80% fail on Linkage
  - 0.80% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  - 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.40% fail on Ball joint
- 4.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
- 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Springs
  - 1.2% fail on Coil springs
    - 1.2% fail on Coil spring
- 1.2% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.40% fail on Sub-frame
  - 0.40% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.40% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover
12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 7.6% fail on Transmission (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 7.2% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 7.2% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.40% fail on Joints
- 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.80% fail on Doors
  - 0.40% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.40% fail on Door condition
  - 0.40% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.40% fail on Door condition
- 0.80% fail on Seats
  - 0.80% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.40% fail on Chassis
  - 0.40% fail on Strengthening plate
- 0.40% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.40% fail on Pipe
- 0.40% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.40% fail on Engine mounting condition
12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 11% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 10% fail on Spark ignition
    - 7.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  - 0.40% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.40% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
9.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (48% better than other 2000 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.2% fail on Headlamps
  - 3.2% fail on Headlamp
- 1.6% fail on Position lamps
  - 1.6% fail on Position lamp
- 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.2% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.80% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.40% fail on Switch
- 0.80% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.40% fail on Electrical wiring
  - 0.40% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.40% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.40% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.40% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
9.2% fail on Visibility
- 5.6% fail on Washers
- 4.8% fail on Wipers
- 0.40% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.40% fail on Windscreen
- 0.40% fail on View to rear
  - 0.40% fail on Mirrors
7.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 4.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Seat belts
  - 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.40% fail on Condition
- 0.40% fail on Airbags
  - 0.40% fail on Drivers airbag
6.4% fail on Steering
- 5.2% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 5.2% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.80% fail on Track rod end
- 0.40% fail on Power steering
  - 0.40% fail on Pump
4.8% fail on Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.40% fail on Registration plates
0.40% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.40% fail on Attachment