Alfa Romeo GTV MOT Results

Registered in 1999
52.2% pass rate
from 360 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GTV is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Brakes (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 23% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 19% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 10% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Rear wheels (79% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.2% fail on Components
        • 5.0% fail on Hoses (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.56% fail on Valves
        • 0.28% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.7% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.2% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on ABS
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
        • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.28% fail on Lever
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 8.1% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Front drive shafts (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
    • 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.1% fail on Subframe mounting (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Component mounting
    • 5.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.1% fail on Rear (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Front
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (35% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (54% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (67% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (75% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.56% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.56% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.56% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.56% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.56% fail on Switch
    • 0.56% fail on Horn
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.9% fail on Emissions
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust system (61% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.28% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on Pipe
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.6% fail on Washers
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.56% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.28% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (59% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Size/type
  • 6.7% fail on Steering
    • 6.1% fail on Steering system
      • 3.1% fail on Steering rack (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.56% fail on Power steering
      • 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.28% fail on Other components
    • 0.28% fail on Steering control
      • 0.28% fail on Steering column
  • 3.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.4% fail on Body condition
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 0.83% fail on Passengers front (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers
    • 0.56% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.56% fail on Chassis
    • 0.56% fail on Seats
      • 0.56% fail on Drivers
    • 0.28% fail on Engine mountings
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
  • 0.28% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages