Alfa Romeo GTV MOT Results
Registered in 199952.2% pass rate
from 360 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GTV is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Brakes
(69% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
23% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 19% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 10% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Rear wheels (79% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Front wheels
- 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.2% fail on
Components
- 5.0% fail on Hoses (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Pipes
- 0.56% fail on Valves
- 0.28% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.7% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Operation
-
9.2% fail on
Components
-
3.1% fail on
Hub components
- 1.9% fail on Brake discs
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
-
2.2% fail on
Parking brake
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 2.2% fail on ABS
-
0.28% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.28% fail on
Pedal
- 0.28% fail on Condition
-
0.28% fail on
Pedal
-
0.28% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.28% fail on Lever
-
23% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
23% fail on
Suspension
-
8.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.56% fail on Condition
-
5.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 3.1% fail on Subframe mounting (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Component mounting
-
5.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.28% fail on Linkage condition
-
3.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 3.1% fail on Rear (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Front
-
2.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.28% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.28% fail on Condition
-
0.28% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.28% fail on Condition
-
8.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(35% better than other 1999 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.6% fail on Front lamps
- 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (54% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamps
(67% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (75% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.56% fail on Individual lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.56% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.56% fail on Fog lamp
-
0.56% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.56% fail on Switch
- 0.56% fail on Horn
- 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
-
4.4% fail on
Position lamps
-
15% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.9% fail on Emissions
- 8.3% fail on Exhaust system (61% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.28% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.28% fail on Pipe
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.6% fail on Washers
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 0.56% fail on Bonnet
- 0.28% fail on Mirrors
-
8.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(59% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
-
7.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Tyres
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 0.28% fail on Size/type
-
6.7% fail on
Steering
-
6.1% fail on
Steering system
- 3.1% fail on Steering rack (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Track rod end
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint
-
0.56% fail on
Power steering
- 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.28% fail on Other components
-
0.28% fail on
Steering control
- 0.28% fail on Steering column
-
6.1% fail on
Steering system
-
3.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.4% fail on Body condition
-
1.1% fail on
Doors
- 0.83% fail on Passengers front (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Drivers
-
0.56% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.56% fail on Chassis
-
0.56% fail on
Seats
- 0.56% fail on Drivers
- 0.28% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.28% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.28% fail on Attachment
-
0.28% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.28% fail on Registration plate