Alfa Romeo GTV MOT Results

Registered in 1998
54.9% pass rate
from 235 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GTV is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 26% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 20% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
          • 10% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
          • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.43% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.85% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.85% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.85% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.85% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.43% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.43% fail on Cable
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.85% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.85% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.43% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.43% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim (95% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.43% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Hazard warning (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.85% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.85% fail on Horn
    • 0.85% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.85% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.43% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 6.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Suspension arm
    • 4.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.85% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.85% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.85% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.43% fail on Springs
      • 0.43% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.43% fail on Coil spring
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.7% fail on Transmission
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Joints
      • 0.43% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.43% fail on Joints
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.85% fail on Doors
      • 0.85% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.85% fail on Door condition
    • 0.43% fail on Chassis
      • 0.43% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Pipe
    • 0.43% fail on Body
      • 0.43% fail on Panel
    • 0.43% fail on Seats
      • 0.43% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.4% fail on Washers (100% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.43% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 9.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 7.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.43% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.43% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.43% fail on Airbags
      • 0.43% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 5.1% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.85% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.43% fail on Size/type
  • 0.85% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.43% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.43% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages