Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2010
60.0% pass rate
from 115 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 10% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Headlamps (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Headlamp levelling device (49 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Electrical equipment (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Electrical wiring (66 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.87% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.87% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.87% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.87% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 6.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 3.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 3.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.87% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.87% fail on Cable
    • 6.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.87% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.87% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.87% fail on Lever
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility
    • 7.8% fail on Washers (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
  • 9.6% fail on Suspension
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.2% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (35 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.5% fail on Transmission
      • 3.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.5% fail on Joints
    • 2.6% fail on Doors (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Front passenger's door (35 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Door condition (36 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system
  • 6.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.87% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.87% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.87% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.87% fail on Undertray
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 6.1% fail on Condition
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.87% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.87% fail on Condition
  • 0.87% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.87% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.87% fail on Steering
    • 0.87% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.87% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.87% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.87% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages