Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.0% pass rate
from 142 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp levelling device (49 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.70% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Electrical equipment (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Battery(ies) (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Horn
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.70% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.70% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.70% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.70% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.70% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.70% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 9.9% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.70% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.70% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.70% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.70% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.70% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.70% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.70% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.70% fail on Levelling valve
    • 0.70% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 7.0% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Driver's view (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Wipers
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.70% fail on Size/type
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.9% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.70% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.70% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 5.6% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.70% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.70% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt
          • 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Cable (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.4% fail on Doors (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.70% fail on Door condition
      • 0.70% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.70% fail on Door condition
    • 0.70% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.70% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.70% fail on Tank
    • 0.70% fail on Transmission
      • 0.70% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.70% fail on Joints
    • 0.70% fail on Seats
      • 0.70% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.70% fail on Steering play
      • 0.70% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.70% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.70% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages