Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2010
54.6% pass rate
from 130 tests in 2017
(48% worse than other 2010 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Front lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (100 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device (167 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (25 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.77% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.77% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Battery (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.77% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.77% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.77% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.77% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.77% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.77% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Suspension (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Suspension arms (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Attachment
    • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Front drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Front suspension joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.77% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.77% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.77% fail on Front
  • 12% fail on Tyres
    • 6.9% fail on Condition
    • 6.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Size/type (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 8.5% fail on Brakes
    • 4.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.77% fail on Brake calipers
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical components (49 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Cable (61 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Restricted movement
  • 6.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
  • 2.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Doors (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Passengers front (32 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Drivers
  • 0.77% fail on Steering
    • 0.77% fail on Steering system
      • 0.77% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.77% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.77% fail on Condition
  • 0.77% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.77% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.77% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp

Search Good Garages