Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2009
52.6% pass rate
from 211 tests in 2020
(30% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Headlamp aim (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies) (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.95% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.95% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.47% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.47% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.95% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.95% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.95% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.47% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.47% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 21% fail on Suspension (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 17% fail on Suspension arms (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.95% fail on Suspension arm (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (60 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.95% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Linkage
      • 0.95% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.47% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.47% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.47% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 10.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Emissions not tested (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.47% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 2.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.47% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 10.0% fail on Brakes
    • 7.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 3.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Cable (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.47% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.47% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 9.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
    • 1.4% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Front passenger's door (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Door condition (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.47% fail on Door condition
    • 0.95% fail on Chassis (58 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Chassis condition (60 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.47% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.47% fail on Body
      • 0.47% fail on Panel
  • 9.0% fail on Tyres
    • 6.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.3% fail on Condition
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility
    • 5.7% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers
  • 1.9% fail on Steering
    • 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.95% fail on Prescribed areas (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
  • 0.95% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.47% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages