Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2008
48.2% pass rate
from 738 tests in 2021
(26% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension (42% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 11% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.41% fail on Suspension arm
    • 5.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.3% fail on Springs (61% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Coil springs (61% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Coil spring (61% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.68% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.27% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.14% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.14% fail on Suspension rod
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (50% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.68% fail on Horn
      • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.14% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.81% fail on Direction indicators (62% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Flashing type (62% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.81% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.81% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.81% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (80% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Brakes (31% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.41% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.27% fail on Decelerometer (20 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.27% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 5.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (84% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.2% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Cable (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Lever
        • 0.14% fail on Linkage
    • 0.95% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.81% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.68% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.68% fail on Lever
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.27% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.27% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (97% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Transmission
      • 3.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.9% fail on Joints
        • 0.14% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.27% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.27% fail on Joints
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front passenger's door (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Door condition (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Catch
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 0.68% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Tank
      • 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.54% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Passenger's seat (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.27% fail on Body
      • 0.14% fail on Panel
      • 0.14% fail on Other body component
    • 0.14% fail on Floor
  • 11% fail on Visibility (68% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Washers (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.6% fail on Tyres (47% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 8.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (50% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (51% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.95% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.8% fail on Compression ignition (77% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.81% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.68% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.54% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.1% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.41% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 0.14% fail on Steering wheel
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (83% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
      • 0.14% fail on Requirements
    • 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.68% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.68% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages