Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2008
50.9% pass rate
from 907 tests in 2017
(32% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (25% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Headlamp aim (93% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Position lamps (80% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Front lamps (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.11% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.99% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.88% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.88% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.88% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.44% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.55% fail on Horn
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 19% fail on Suspension (40% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (50% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (70% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.88% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.77% fail on Rear
      • 0.11% fail on Front
    • 0.55% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 14% fail on Tyres (75% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.33% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 11% fail on Brakes (37% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Brake performance (65% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.22% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
    • 5.4% fail on Hub components (77% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (66% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.77% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.77% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on Electronic stability system (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Mechanical components (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Cable (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic systems (76% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Components (82% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 0.11% fail on ABS
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road (74% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Emissions
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Cap
      • 0.11% fail on System
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.6% fail on Steering
    • 2.5% fail on Steering system (81% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.44% fail on Free play (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.22% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Rams
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
  • 2.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers front (13 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Drivers (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Seats (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Passengers (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Body condition
  • 0.77% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment
  • 0.66% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.66% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.55% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.44% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.44% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.11% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages