MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Alfa Romeo » GT » 2006

Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2006
50.4% pass rate
from 446 tests in 2021
(15% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (43% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 14% fail on Suspension arms (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.67% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 7.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.67% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.67% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Springs
      • 2.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.7% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.90% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.45% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.45% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.67% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.67% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (63% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (79% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.90% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.90% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (76% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.0% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Cable (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Lever
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.90% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.67% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.45% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.67% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.45% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.45% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.22% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.22% fail on Lever
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.90% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.90% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.45% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.45% fail on Horn
      • 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.22% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (67% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 3.1% fail on Transmission
      • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.1% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Seats (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Driver's seat (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Passenger's seat (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Doors
      • 0.45% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.45% fail on Door condition
      • 0.22% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition
    • 0.45% fail on Body
      • 0.45% fail on Other body component
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Tank
    • 0.22% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Floor
    • 0.22% fail on Undertray
  • 13% fail on Visibility (80% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 12% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Wipers (73% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Airbags
      • 0.22% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 7.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.22% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.22% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.90% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.90% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Size/type
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.67% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.22% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.22% fail on Steering play
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.45% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.45% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages