Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2006
49.5% pass rate
from 756 tests in 2020
(15% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension (53% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 15% fail on Suspension arms (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (77% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.5% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.66% fail on Springs (85% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Coil springs (85% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Coil spring (85% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Shock absorbers (68% better than other 2006 cars)
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.5% fail on Headlamp aim (86% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim (99% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Position lamp (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.53% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.6% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.40% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (67% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (65% better than other 2006 cars)
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 9.7% fail on Brake performance (54% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (99% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (97% worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.53% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.53% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
    • 6.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (69% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.13% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.9% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Cable (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Pivot (36 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.2% fail on Lever (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.53% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.40% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.26% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.40% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.40% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.26% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Other components (13 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (99% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust system (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame (13 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame condition (15 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.0% fail on Joints
    • 2.0% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Front passenger's door (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Driver's door (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Door condition (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Seats (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Passenger's seat (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Pipe
      • 0.13% fail on System
    • 0.26% fail on Floor (25 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Cabs (23 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas (27 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Undertray
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
      • 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Condition (67% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 9.0% fail on Visibility
    • 7.1% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Wipers (68% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Condition of glass (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Windscreen (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on View to rear
      • 0.40% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.26% fail on Driver's view
  • 8.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.4% fail on Compression ignition (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.13% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 3.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.79% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.79% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 7.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Airbags
      • 0.26% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.26% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.13% fail on Steering column
  • 0.93% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.66% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment
  • 0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.13% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.13% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages