Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2005
48.5% pass rate
from 1,024 tests in 2017
(14% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (16% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Position lamps (44% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Front lamps (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.20% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Headlamp levelling device (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.098% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.098% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.098% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.098% fail on Matched pair
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.39% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (44% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (59% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Fog lamp (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Battery (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.20% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.098% fail on Switch
      • 0.098% fail on Tell tale
  • 26% fail on Suspension (34% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 7.6% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Component mounting (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (37% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (42% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (78% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.1% fail on Front suspension joints (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings (76% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear
      • 1.3% fail on Front (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.59% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition (92% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Location
    • 0.49% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake performance (42% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.78% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.098% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (46% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Components (53% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Hoses
        • 0.39% fail on Pipes (86% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.098% fail on Servos
      • 0.29% fail on Leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
      • 0.098% fail on Fitment
    • 0.98% fail on Mechanical components (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on ABS
    • 0.29% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.20% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.098% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.098% fail on Pedal
        • 0.098% fail on Anti-slip
  • 13% fail on Tyres (42% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Condition (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.59% fail on Size/type
    • 0.39% fail on Valve stem (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (99% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Emissions
    • 0.88% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.59% fail on System (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Tank
      • 0.098% fail on Pipe
      • 0.098% fail on Cap
    • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
      • 0.098% fail on Requirements
  • 9.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Washers (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.59% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.39% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.098% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Doors
      • 0.49% fail on Drivers (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.098% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.098% fail on Seats
      • 0.098% fail on Passengers
  • 2.2% fail on Steering (44% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering system
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.39% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.098% fail on Free play
        • 0.098% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.098% fail on Power steering
      • 0.098% fail on Operation
      • 0.098% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.88% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
    • 0.098% fail on Halfshafts
  • 0.88% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.88% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages