Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results
Registered in 200550.1% pass rate
from 409 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Suspension
- 8.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.1% fail on Pins and bushes (93% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Ball joint
- 0.49% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.73% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.24% fail on Linkage
- 0.24% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint
- 0.24% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.4% fail on
Sub-frames
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
-
2.0% fail on
Springs
(58% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
(58% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Coil spring (68% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Mounting (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
(58% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Suspension rods
(7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.49% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
-
0.24% fail on
Axles
- 0.24% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.24% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
(78% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp (56% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Electrical equipment
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Battery(ies)
- 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.73% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.73% fail on Position lamp
- 0.24% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.24% fail on Rear reflectors
-
6.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
(78% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
16% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(86% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Exhaust system (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Transmission
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.7% fail on Joints
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.4% fail on
Chassis
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Doors
-
0.49% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.49% fail on Door condition
-
0.24% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.24% fail on Door condition
-
0.49% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.49% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.49% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.24% fail on Floor
-
0.24% fail on
Seats
- 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
-
14% fail on
Visibility
(82% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 10% fail on Washers (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Wipers
-
0.24% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.24% fail on Windscreen
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
8.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.49% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
4.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
- 0.24% fail on Brake linings
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Linkage
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.73% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.73% fail on Lever
-
0.49% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.49% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.49% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.49% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.24% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.24% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.24% fail on Hand lever
-
0.24% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.24% fail on Servos
- 0.24% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
8.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Condition
- 6.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Airbags
- 0.24% fail on Drivers airbag
-
6.6% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.49% fail on
Emission control equipment
(11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
- 0.24% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.24% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
3.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.24% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.24% fail on Catalytic converter
-
5.4% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.24% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
8.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
- 4.4% fail on Condition
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
-
2.7% fail on
Steering
-
0.98% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.73% fail on Track rod end
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint
-
0.73% fail on
Power steering
- 0.49% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Other components
-
0.49% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.49% fail on Steering rack
-
0.49% fail on
Steering play
- 0.49% fail on Steering rack
-
0.98% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.24% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.24% fail on Registration plates
-
0.24% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.24% fail on Anchorages
-
0.24% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Condition