Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2005
46.9% pass rate
from 751 tests in 2020
(17% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint (76% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.67% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 8.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (57% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Sub-frame (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.40% fail on Shock absorbers (74% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.27% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.27% fail on Springs (94% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Coil spring (94% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Position lamp (99% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.3% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (60% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (66% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (94% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Transmission
      • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Joints
        • 0.27% fail on Drive shaft (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.40% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.67% fail on Doors
      • 0.40% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.40% fail on Door condition
      • 0.27% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
    • 0.53% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Hose
      • 0.13% fail on Pipe
      • 0.13% fail on System
    • 0.27% fail on Undertray
    • 0.13% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
      • 0.13% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 8.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.93% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.93% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (62% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.7% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Cable (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.53% fail on Pedal
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.27% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.53% fail on Rigid brake pipes (82% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.27% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.27% fail on Lever
    • 0.27% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.13% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
  • 12% fail on Visibility (61% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Washers (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.27% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.27% fail on View to rear
      • 0.27% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Condition
    • 5.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Airbags
      • 0.27% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 5.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.40% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.40% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 11% fail on Tyres (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.5% fail on Condition (75% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Size/type
  • 2.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end (53% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.53% fail on Power steering
      • 0.27% fail on Other components
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.27% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.1% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.67% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.13% fail on Vehicle Identification Number

Search Good Garages