Alfa Romeo GT MOT Results

Registered in 2004
50.6% pass rate
from 534 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo GT is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Headlamp aim (71% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.7% fail on Front lamps
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.19% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.19% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Fog lamp (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (50% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (63% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 0.75% fail on Horn
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.19% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 9.7% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
      • 0.37% fail on Attachment
    • 6.7% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Component mounting (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (57% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.4% fail on Front suspension joints (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.56% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
    • 0.56% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
    • 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.37% fail on Rear
    • 0.19% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 14% fail on Tyres (52% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Condition (95% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.56% fail on Size/type
    • 0.19% fail on Valve stem
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 7.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.56% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.37% fail on Front wheels (81% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.2% fail on Components
        • 2.1% fail on Hoses
        • 1.1% fail on Pipes (70% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Servos
      • 0.19% fail on Leaks
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.56% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on ABS
    • 0.75% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.19% fail on Restricted movement
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (79% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Emissions
    • 0.37% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on System
    • 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
      • 0.56% fail on Requirements (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Installation check
        • 0.19% fail on Belt(s)/padding
    • 3.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.8% fail on Washers (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.19% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Doors
      • 0.56% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.19% fail on Drivers
    • 0.56% fail on Seats
      • 0.37% fail on Drivers
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers
    • 0.19% fail on Body security
  • 2.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering system (53% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.37% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.75% fail on Power steering
      • 0.56% fail on Pipes and hoses (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pump
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 0.94% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.94% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages