Alfa Romeo Giulietta MOT Results

Registered in 2017

86.1% pass rate

from 1,558 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Giulietta is unusually good or bad.

4.1% fail on Visibility
- 3.1% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Wipers (62% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Bonnet
- 0.064% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.064% fail on Windscreen
3.6% fail on Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
2.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 0.96% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.96% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.96% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.96% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.83% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.19% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.064% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.064% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.064% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.064% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.064% fail on Horn
2.1% fail on Brakes
- 1.2% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.58% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.58% fail on Rbt
      - 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.45% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.45% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.064% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.064% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.064% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.96% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 0.51% fail on Brake linings and pads (59% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.51% fail on Brake pads (59% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.45% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.45% fail on Brake discs
- 0.13% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control
0.64% fail on Suspension
- 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.064% fail on Springs
  - 0.064% fail on Coil springs
    - 0.064% fail on Coil spring
- 0.064% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.064% fail on Pins and bushes
0.64% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 0.64% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 0.58% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.51% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions
  - 0.064% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.064% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
0.45% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 0.39% fail on Doors (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Driver's door (60 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.26% fail on Door condition (69 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Front passenger's door (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Door condition (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Body
  - 0.064% fail on Other body component
0.26% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.26% fail on Registration plates
0.19% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Attachment
0.13% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.064% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.064% fail on Condition
- 0.064% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
0.064% fail on Steering
- 0.064% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.064% fail on Track rod end