Alfa Romeo Giulietta MOT Results

Registered in 2010
66.6% pass rate
from 2,230 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Giulietta is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.045% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Position lamps (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Position lamp (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Reversing lamps (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Reversing lamps (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Stop lamp (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Horn
    • 0.045% fail on Daytime running lamps
  • 8.3% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.2% fail on Springs (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Coil springs (43% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Coil spring (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Linkage
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint dust cover (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.045% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.76% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.31% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.045% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.045% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.045% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 5.8% fail on Brakes
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.045% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.85% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.85% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.22% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.22% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (32% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance (60% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Rbt (59% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.090% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.45% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.45% fail on Rbt
          • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.045% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.045% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.090% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
      • 0.045% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.090% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.090% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.090% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.045% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.045% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.045% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.045% fail on Servos
    • 0.045% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.045% fail on Lever
  • 5.0% fail on Visibility
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.36% fail on Driver's view (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.045% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.045% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.90% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.045% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.045% fail on Undertray
  • 2.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Doors (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Driver's door (22 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Door condition (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Front passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
    • 0.27% fail on Transmission (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Joints (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.13% fail on Exhaust system (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.045% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.045% fail on Body
      • 0.045% fail on Other body component
    • 0.045% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.045% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.72% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.54% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 0.63% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.54% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment
  • 0.27% fail on Steering (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering linkage components (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.090% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Steering play
      • 0.045% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.045% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.045% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.045% fail on Doors
      • 0.045% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors

Search Good Garages