MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Alfa Romeo » Giulietta » 2010

Alfa Romeo Giulietta MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.4% pass rate
from 2,065 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Giulietta is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.048% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.68% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Individual direction indicators (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.0% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Stop lamp (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Horn
      • 0.048% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.048% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.097% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 5.0% fail on Springs
      • 5.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.0% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.097% fail on Mounting
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.63% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.097% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.048% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.048% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.15% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.048% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.048% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.048% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.048% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 7.5% fail on Brakes
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Rbt (51% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance (49% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.097% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.82% fail on Rbt
          • 0.77% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.048% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.048% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.048% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.19% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.097% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.097% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.048% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.44% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Lever
    • 0.58% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.58% fail on Lever
    • 0.44% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.29% fail on Pedal
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.048% fail on Servos
    • 0.15% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.048% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.097% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Condition (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 5.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.048% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.048% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.048% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.048% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.39% fail on Catalyst emissions (58% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.048% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.048% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.097% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.097% fail on Undertray (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Driver's door (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
      • 0.15% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
    • 0.53% fail on Transmission (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Drive shafts (65% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Joints (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Boot lid (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Boot lid condition (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.097% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.048% fail on Pipe
    • 0.097% fail on Chassis
      • 0.097% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.048% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.048% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.048% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.048% fail on Passenger compartment
    • 0.048% fail on Undertray
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.73% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.53% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.63% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.63% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.48% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment
    • 0.097% fail on Condition
  • 0.29% fail on Steering (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Steering linkage components (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.097% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.048% fail on Power steering
      • 0.048% fail on Operation
  • 0.048% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.048% fail on Doors
      • 0.048% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors

Search Good Garages