Alfa Romeo Giulietta MOT Results

Registered in 2010
71.7% pass rate
from 1,868 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Giulietta is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.054% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.054% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Front lamps (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Fog lamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Stop lamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Horn
    • 0.054% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 9.2% fail on Tyres (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Condition (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.32% fail on Size/type
  • 5.9% fail on Suspension (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.054% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Coil springs (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Location (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.64% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.54% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.48% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.48% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.054% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.054% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.43% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.37% fail on Rear
      • 0.054% fail on Front
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.054% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.054% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.054% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.054% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 4.4% fail on Brakes
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.11% fail on Brake discs (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.21% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.16% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.27% fail on Components
        • 0.27% fail on Hoses
      • 0.054% fail on Leaks
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
        • 0.21% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.21% fail on ABS
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.054% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 4.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.96% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Drivers (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers front (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.054% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.054% fail on Body condition
  • 0.64% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Emissions
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on System
      • 0.054% fail on Cap
    • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.59% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.43% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
      • 0.054% fail on Requirements
    • 0.16% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.054% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.054% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.054% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.54% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.32% fail on Steering (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering system (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Other components
        • 0.054% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.11% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.054% fail on Power steering
      • 0.054% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 0.054% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages