MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Alfa Romeo » Giulia » 2017

Alfa Romeo Giulia MOT Results

Registered in 2017
84.4% pass rate
from 2,075 tests in 2021
(19% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Giulia is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.0% fail on Tyres (74% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Condition (95% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth (87% worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 5.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (87% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (200% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp levelling device (11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.34% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.096% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.096% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.048% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.048% fail on Horn
  • 2.8% fail on Brakes
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (57% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.77% fail on Brake discs and drums (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.048% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.24% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.096% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.096% fail on Rbt
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.048% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.048% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.048% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.048% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.048% fail on Rbt
          • 0.048% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.048% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.048% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.048% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.048% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.048% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.048% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.048% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Spark ignition (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.34% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.67% fail on Visibility (82% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Washers (65% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Wipers (95% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.096% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.048% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.048% fail on View to rear
      • 0.048% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.48% fail on Identification of the vehicle (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Registration plates (140% worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.24% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.096% fail on Body
      • 0.096% fail on Other body component
    • 0.048% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.048% fail on Seats
      • 0.048% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.048% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.048% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.24% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.096% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.096% fail on Condition
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
  • 0.19% fail on Suspension (78% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.096% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.048% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.048% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.14% fail on Steering
    • 0.096% fail on Electronic power steering (32 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.048% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.048% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.048% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages