Alfa Romeo 156 MOT Results
Registered in 199846.2% pass rate
from 132 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo 156 is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Suspension
-
15% fail on
Prescribed areas
(130% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 9.8% fail on Component mounting
- 6.8% fail on Subframe mounting (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Spring mounting
-
7.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 6.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.76% fail on Condition
-
5.3% fail on
Drive shafts
-
5.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 5.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
5.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.8% fail on Front suspension joints
-
3.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.5% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.5% fail on Condition
-
0.76% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.76% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.76% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.76% fail on Rear
-
15% fail on
Prescribed areas
(130% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
25% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
9.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 7.6% fail on Front lamps
- 0.76% fail on All position lamps
- 0.76% fail on Rear lamps
- 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Battery
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp
-
3.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.76% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.5% fail on Horn
- 0.76% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.76% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.76% fail on Fog lamp
-
9.1% fail on
Position lamps
-
21% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(95% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 14% fail on Emissions (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.76% fail on Tank
- 0.76% fail on Cap
- 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested
-
19% fail on
Brakes
-
7.6% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.3% fail on Front wheels
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
- 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.5% fail on
Components
- 3.8% fail on Hoses
- 0.76% fail on Pipes
-
4.5% fail on
Components
- 3.8% fail on ABS
-
3.8% fail on
Hub components
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
- 0.76% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.76% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.76% fail on
Components
- 0.76% fail on Servos
-
0.76% fail on
Components
-
7.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(160% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 9.1% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Drivers airbag
-
9.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.6% fail on Wipers
- 4.5% fail on Washers
- 0.76% fail on Bonnet
- 0.76% fail on Windscreen
- 0.76% fail on Mirrors
-
5.3% fail on
Steering
-
5.3% fail on
Steering system
- 3.8% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Track rod end
-
5.3% fail on
Steering system
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.76% fail on Size/type
-
2.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.76% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.76% fail on Chassis
- 0.76% fail on Body condition
-
0.76% fail on
Doors
- 0.76% fail on Passengers other
-
0.76% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
0.76% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.76% fail on Attachment
-
0.76% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.76% fail on Registration plate