Alfa Romeo 147 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
61.9% pass rate
from 310 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo 147 is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.97% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.97% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.65% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.32% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.65% fail on Stop lamp (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Horn
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 8.7% fail on Suspension arms (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.65% fail on Coil springs (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.65% fail on Rear
    • 0.32% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.32% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.32% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.32% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 9.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Valve stem (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 9.0% fail on Brakes
    • 4.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Front wheels
    • 3.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.32% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.65% fail on Mechanical components (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Cable (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.32% fail on Components
        • 0.32% fail on Hoses
    • 0.32% fail on Restricted movement
  • 5.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.65% fail on Wipers
    • 0.32% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Doors (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Passengers front (33 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Drivers (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Seats (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Drivers (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 3.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.65% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.65% fail on Cap (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Emissions
  • 1.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.97% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.97% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.97% fail on Condition
  • 1.3% fail on Steering
    • 0.97% fail on Steering system
      • 0.65% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.32% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.32% fail on Other components
        • 0.32% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.32% fail on Steering control
      • 0.32% fail on Steering column
  • 0.32% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.32% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages