Aixam Crossline MOT Results
Registered in 201672.9% pass rate
from 70 tests in 2021
(81% worse than other 2016 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Aixam Crossline is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Hazard warning
(1971 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Switch (1971 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Side repeaters (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Brakes
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(51 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(54 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Service brake performance (85 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (58 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(54 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
4.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(51 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.4% fail on Hand lever
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.4% fail on Lever
-
1.4% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 1.4% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 1.4% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers (19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.9% fail on Ball joint (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Other suspension component
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint
-
4.3% fail on
Visibility
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 1.4% fail on Wipers
-
2.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.9% fail on Exhaust system (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Steering
-
1.4% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.4% fail on Steering rack
-
1.4% fail on
Steering gear
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.4% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
1.4% fail on
Fluid leaks
-
1.4% fail on
Tyres
- 1.4% fail on Condition