Aixam Crossline MOT Results
Registered in 201170.6% pass rate
from 68 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Aixam Crossline is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(17 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(15 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (25 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
7.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(15 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
- 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Decelerometer
- 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
-
4.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 1.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
- 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.5% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(17 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.5% fail on Pedal
- 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.5% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
1.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.5% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
1.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
-
1.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.5% fail on
Seats
- 1.5% fail on Driver's seat
-
5.9% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.9% fail on
Hazard warning
(43 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Switch (43 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.5% fail on Horn
-
4.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension
- 4.4% fail on Wheel bearings (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.4% fail on Ball joint
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.5% fail on
Other suspension component
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint
- 1.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.9% fail on
Steering
-
4.4% fail on
Steering gear
(21 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Steering rack (22 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.5% fail on Drag link end
-
4.4% fail on
Steering gear
(21 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.5% fail on
Visibility
- 1.5% fail on Washers