Aixam Crossline MOT Results

Registered in 2011
66.7% pass rate
from 78 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Aixam Crossline is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (34 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (35 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (41 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 6.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (31 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.3% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 5.1% fail on Other suspension component (30 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Ball joint (56 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings (11 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 10% fail on Steering (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Steering gear (55 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Steering rack (61 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Drag link end
  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.3% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.3% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Horn
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Seats (101 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Driver's seat (126 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 2.6% fail on Fuel system (15 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pipe
      • 1.3% fail on System
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Engine mounting
      • 1.3% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 1.3% fail on Body
      • 1.3% fail on Body condition
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.6% fail on Visibility
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
  • 2.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages