Abarth Punto MOT Results

Registered in 2009
67.2% pass rate
from 177 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Abarth Punto is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Brakes (94% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.56% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.56% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.56% fail on Lever
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 5.1% fail on Springs
      • 5.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.1% fail on Coil spring
    • 4.0% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.56% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.56% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.56% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.56% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.56% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 9.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.56% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.56% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.56% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.56% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.56% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.56% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 6.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.2% fail on Spark ignition (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.56% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
  • 4.0% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Wipers
  • 3.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Joints
    • 0.56% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.56% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.56% fail on Doors
      • 0.56% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.56% fail on Catch
  • 2.3% fail on Steering
    • 2.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.56% fail on Other components
        • 0.56% fail on Steering linkage
  • 0.56% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.56% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.56% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.56% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages