Abarth 595 MOT Results
Registered in 201679.8% pass rate
from 3,376 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Abarth 595 is unusually good or bad.
-
5.6% fail on
Visibility
(42% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Wipers (29% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Washers (89% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.089% fail on Windscreen
-
4.1% fail on
Brakes
(45% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(58% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads
-
1.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(170% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.71% fail on
Service brake performance
(74% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Rbt
(78% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.71% fail on
Rbt
(78% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.089% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.059% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.059% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.030% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.030% fail on
Rbt
- 0.030% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.030% fail on
Rbt
-
0.71% fail on
Service brake performance
(74% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.089% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.030% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.030% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.030% fail on Hand lever
-
0.030% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.030% fail on Lever
- 0.030% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.030% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.030% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
3.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(58% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.089% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamps
(56% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Headlamp
- 0.089% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.089% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.59% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.33% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.33% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.089% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.33% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.27% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.12% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.089% fail on Horn
- 0.030% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.089% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.089% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.089% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.089% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.089% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.089% fail on Reversing lamps
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
3.6% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.030% fail on Size/type
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension
(42% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Wheel bearings (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.56% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.089% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.65% fail on
Springs
(43% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Coil springs
(43% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Coil spring (45% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Mounting
-
0.65% fail on
Coil springs
(43% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Macpherson strut
(30 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes (35 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (32 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.030% fail on Ball joint
- 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.059% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.030% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.030% fail on Ball joint
-
0.030% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.030% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
0.030% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.030% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
1.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(69% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(76% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Catalyst emissions (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Emission control equipment
(9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Catalytic converter (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(76% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.39% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Doors
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Driver's door
(17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Door condition (19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Front passenger's door
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Door condition (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Driver's door
(17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Transmission
-
0.12% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.12% fail on Joints
-
0.12% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.089% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.059% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.030% fail on Hose
-
0.059% fail on
Seats
- 0.059% fail on Passenger's seat (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Undertray
-
0.33% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.33% fail on Registration plates
-
0.089% fail on
Steering
-
0.059% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.030% fail on Ball joint
- 0.030% fail on Track rod end
-
0.030% fail on
Power steering
- 0.030% fail on Operation
-
0.059% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.089% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.059% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.059% fail on Condition
- 0.030% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.059% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.059% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.030% fail on Condition
- 0.030% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review