Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2017
80.7% pass rate
from 11,779 tests in 2021
(18% better than other 2017 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (32% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.051% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (74% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (47% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp (45% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp (46% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.0085% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.0085% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (61% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Direction indicators (51% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Flashing type (51% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Side repeaters (45% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Individual direction indicators (62% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Headlamps (68% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp (68% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.58% fail on Stop lamp (64% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Electrical equipment (59% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.034% fail on Horn
    • 0.19% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.085% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 4.6% fail on Suspension (56% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Springs (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.017% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.0085% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 0.36% fail on Anti-roll bars (54% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Linkage ball joints (69% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.025% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0085% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0085% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.0085% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.20% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.059% fail on Suspension arms (93% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes (90% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.025% fail on Wheel bearings (87% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.025% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.017% fail on Suspension rod (13 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.0085% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.017% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.017% fail on Suspension unit (13 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.0085% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0085% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.0085% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0085% fail on Other suspension component
  • 4.4% fail on Brakes (20% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (36% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (30% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads (31% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.025% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs and drums (64% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Brake discs (70% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.042% fail on Brake drums (9 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Electronic braking system (6 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (42% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.025% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.017% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0085% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0085% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0085% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.55% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.093% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0085% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0085% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.29% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (76% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.0085% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance (44% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (44% better than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance (48% better than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.034% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0085% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0085% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
      • 0.051% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.12% fail on Parking brake control (56% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Lever (56% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (130% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (11 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.017% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.085% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.059% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.017% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.017% fail on Valves (10 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.068% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0085% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0085% fail on Leaks
    • 0.0085% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth (20% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.017% fail on Size/type (83% better than other 2017 vans)
  • 2.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.10% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.059% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.017% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0085% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.0085% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.017% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.45% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.017% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.10% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.068% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.025% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.0085% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 1.9% fail on Visibility (62% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (27% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Wipers (85% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.076% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.068% fail on Condition of glass (80% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Windscreen (80% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on View to rear (90% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Mirrors (92% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.0085% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.0085% fail on Driver's view
  • 0.99% fail on Body, chassis, structure (32% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Transmission (35% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Drive shafts (46% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Joints (44% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.068% fail on Joints
        • 0.025% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.16% fail on Body (46% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component
      • 0.017% fail on Panel
    • 0.11% fail on Doors
      • 0.085% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.017% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.017% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0085% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0085% fail on Door condition
    • 0.10% fail on Spare wheel (170% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Spare wheel condition (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Carrier
    • 0.059% fail on Exhaust system (64% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.059% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.042% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.017% fail on Pipe
      • 0.017% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0085% fail on System
    • 0.025% fail on Load security
      • 0.025% fail on Tailgate (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.017% fail on Tailgate condition (6 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.0085% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.025% fail on Boot lid (7 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.017% fail on Boot lid condition (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.0085% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.017% fail on Towbar
      • 0.017% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0085% fail on Seats
      • 0.0085% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.65% fail on Identification of the vehicle (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plates (130% worse than other 2017 vans)
  • 0.35% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (47% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts (49% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Condition (50% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Requirements
    • 0.076% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.017% fail on Airbags
      • 0.017% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment
  • 0.085% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.076% fail on Steering linkage components (82% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.0085% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.0085% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.0085% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0085% fail on Belt(s)/padding