Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 2006
63.4% pass rate
from 366 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.27% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.27% fail on Switch
      • 0.27% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.4% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Rear reflectors (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 5.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (93% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Components (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Pipes (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Hoses
      • 0.55% fail on Leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.55% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.27% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.5% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (61% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Parking brake performance (73% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.55% fail on Rear wheels (81% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake control components (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Anti-slip (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.55% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage
    • 0.27% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.27% fail on Components
        • 0.27% fail on Pipes
  • 11% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Drag link end (71 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Free play
        • 0.55% fail on Steering box (380 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Steering box
      • 0.27% fail on Steering damper
      • 0.27% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.27% fail on Other components
        • 0.27% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.55% fail on Steering operation (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering
      • 0.27% fail on Other components
    • 0.27% fail on Locking devices
  • 8.5% fail on Suspension (49% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Axles (61 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Swivel joints/housing (124 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.82% fail on Front
      • 0.82% fail on Rear
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
      • 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.55% fail on Suspension arms (85% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (84% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.27% fail on General condition
    • 0.27% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.27% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.27% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 8.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.2% fail on Washers (88% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.55% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.27% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.5% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on System (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Cap (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Emissions
    • 0.27% fail on Exhaust system
  • 2.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.4% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.27% fail on Drivers
      • 0.27% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.82% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Passengers (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Drivers
    • 0.27% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.27% fail on Body condition
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres (74% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth (78% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Requirements (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment
      • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages