MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Defender 110 » 2006

Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 2006
64.9% pass rate
from 447 tests in 2020
(20% better than other 2006 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.22% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.22% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.67% fail on Rear reflectors (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.67% fail on Horn
    • 0.45% fail on Hazard warning (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 4.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (64% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (69% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.22% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.89% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.89% fail on Rbt
          • 0.89% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.22% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.45% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.45% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
    • 0.22% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.22% fail on Lever
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.22% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
  • 11% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Ball joint (23 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.7% fail on Drag link end (42 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.67% fail on Steering box (117 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
    • 0.67% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.22% fail on Rams
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
    • 0.22% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.22% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.22% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.22% fail on Steering play
      • 0.22% fail on Steering box
  • 7.4% fail on Suspension (55% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (71% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Axles (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Swivel joints/housing (131 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Axle
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.89% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.67% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.67% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.22% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
  • 4.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission
      • 1.6% fail on Prop shafts (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Prop shaft (14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.45% fail on Tank
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
      • 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.22% fail on System
    • 0.89% fail on Body (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Other body component (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Panel
    • 0.67% fail on Seats
      • 0.67% fail on Passenger's seat (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.22% fail on Chassis
      • 0.22% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.22% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Towbar
      • 0.22% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.22% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition
    • 0.22% fail on Cabs
      • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.22% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.22% fail on Other emission control equipment
    • 0.45% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.45% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.45% fail on Requirements (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres (67% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth (56% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2006 cars)
  • 0.45% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages