Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results
Registered in 199659.6% pass rate
from 307 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
6.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(150% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Fog lamp (160% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Tell tale
- 0.33% fail on Switch
- 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
5.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(100% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Flashing type
(100% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 2.6% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
-
5.5% fail on
Flashing type
(100% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.9% fail on Rear lamps
- 2.6% fail on Front lamps
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.33% fail on Switch
- 1.3% fail on Horn
- 0.98% fail on Rear reflectors (9 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.98% fail on Lamp (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Switch
- 0.33% fail on Tell tale
- 0.33% fail on Battery
-
6.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(150% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
6.5% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 6.2% fail on Component mounting
- 1.3% fail on Spring mounting
-
4.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
(130% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.98% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.33% fail on Attachment
- 0.33% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.65% fail on
Suspension arms
(79% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.65% fail on
Panhard rods
(9 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (16 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.33% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.33% fail on
Axles
- 0.33% fail on Swivel joints/housing
- 0.33% fail on Front suspension joints
-
6.5% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
6.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.5% fail on
Components
- 4.2% fail on Pipes
- 1.3% fail on Servos (48 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Hoses
- 0.65% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.33% fail on Operation
-
5.5% fail on
Components
-
4.6% fail on
Hub components
(100% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.65% fail on Brake calipers
-
2.0% fail on
Brake performance
(77% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Front wheels
- 0.65% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.33% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.65% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.65% fail on Condition
-
0.65% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.65% fail on
Pedal
- 0.65% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.65% fail on
Pedal
-
6.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
10% fail on
Steering
(120% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Steering system
(140% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Ball joint (9 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Track rod end
- 1.6% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Steering box (12 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Steering arm
-
0.33% fail on
Other components
- 0.33% fail on Steering pivot point
-
1.3% fail on
Power steering
- 1.3% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Steering control
- 0.33% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.33% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.33% fail on Universal joint
- 0.33% fail on Steering operation
- 0.33% fail on Locking devices
- 0.33% fail on Prescribed areas
-
9.4% fail on
Steering system
(140% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
10% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(83% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Body condition
-
2.9% fail on
Seats
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Passengers (9 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Drivers
-
2.0% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.0% fail on Chassis
-
1.3% fail on
Doors
- 0.65% fail on Passengers front
- 0.33% fail on Drivers
- 0.33% fail on Passengers other
- 0.33% fail on Speedometer
- 0.33% fail on Body security
-
8.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 3.6% fail on Washers
- 0.65% fail on Windscreen
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(61% better than other 1996 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.65% fail on Emissions (89% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.65% fail on System
- 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.9% fail on
Tyres
- 1.6% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
-
2.9% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.6% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (69% better than other 1996 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.3% fail on
Towbars
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Towbar
-
2.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate