Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 1984
76.4% pass rate
from 127 tests in 2020
(18% better than other 1984 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1984 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (5.9% better than other 1984 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (14% better than other 1984 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (11% better than other 1984 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators (42% worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type (42% worse than other 1984 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on All direction indicators (120% worse than other 1984 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (5.9% worse than other 1984 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (17% better than other 1984 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (17% better than other 1984 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (14% better than other 1984 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (130% worse than other 1984 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (40% better than other 1984 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.79% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.7% fail on Steering (92% worse than other 1984 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Steering linkage components (27% worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end (91% worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Drag link end (2 times worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.1% fail on Power steering (6 times worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Operation (15 times worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 1984 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering gear (35% worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Steering box (8 times worse than other 1984 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.9% fail on Brakes (11% better than other 1984 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance (16% better than other 1984 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance (12% worse than other 1984 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (10% better than other 1984 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1984 cars)
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.79% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (38% better than other 1984 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.79% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (38% better than other 1984 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.79% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (47% worse than other 1984 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Other components
      • 0.79% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.79% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (57% worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.79% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.79% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.79% fail on Linkage
    • 0.79% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.79% fail on Pedal
    • 0.79% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.79% fail on Servos
  • 7.9% fail on Suspension (0.35% worse than other 1984 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5.9% worse than other 1984 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Axles (3 times worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Swivel joints/housing
      • 0.79% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings (10% better than other 1984 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.79% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.79% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.79% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.79% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.79% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.79% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  • 5.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (23% better than other 1984 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis (110% worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition (120% worse than other 1984 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system (47% worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (5 times worse than other 1984 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.79% fail on Towbar
      • 0.79% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.79% fail on Transmission
      • 0.79% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.79% fail on Joints
  • 2.4% fail on Visibility (65% better than other 1984 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers (43% better than other 1984 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on View to rear
      • 0.79% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.79% fail on Washers
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle (110% worse than other 1984 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates (110% worse than other 1984 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (14% worse than other 1984 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts (14% worse than other 1984 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.79% fail on Requirements
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (67% better than other 1984 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.79% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.79% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.79% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.79% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.79% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.79% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.79% fail on Tyres
    • 0.79% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages