Jaguar XJ6 MOT Results
Registered in 199766.3% pass rate
from 686 tests in 2017
(26% better than other 1997 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XJ6 is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(23% better than other 1997 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp
-
2.6% fail on
Position lamps
(49% better than other 1997 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Front lamps
- 0.29% fail on All position lamps
- 0.15% fail on Rear lamps
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.73% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.15% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.15% fail on Tell tale
- 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (76% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Battery
- 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.15% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.15% fail on Tell tale
- 0.15% fail on Horn
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(36% better than other 1997 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Prescribed areas
(37% better than other 1997 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Component mounting (56% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Subframe mounting
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.9% fail on Front (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Rear
-
2.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.73% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.58% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
- 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.7% fail on Condition
-
0.73% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.58% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Location
-
0.58% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.29% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
0.15% fail on
Axles
- 0.15% fail on Stub axle
-
0.15% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.15% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.15% fail on Universal joint
-
0.15% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
-
4.1% fail on
Prescribed areas
(37% better than other 1997 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Brakes
(39% better than other 1997 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Brake performance
(32% better than other 1997 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.5% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.87% fail on Front wheels (73% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance (83% better than other 1997 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(42% better than other 1997 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Components
(45% better than other 1997 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Hoses
- 1.0% fail on Pipes (71% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Operation
-
3.1% fail on
Components
(45% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.87% fail on ABS
-
0.87% fail on
Hub components
(62% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Brake pads
- 0.15% fail on Brake discs
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.15% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Restricted movement
-
6.0% fail on
Brake performance
(32% better than other 1997 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.3% fail on Emissions
- 2.5% fail on Exhaust system (50% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.58% fail on Pipe
- 0.29% fail on System
- 0.15% fail on Cap
- 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
0.29% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.29% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
5.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
5.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 3.2% fail on Body condition
-
1.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.7% fail on Chassis
-
0.58% fail on
Seats
- 0.58% fail on Drivers
- 0.15% fail on Speedometer
- 0.15% fail on Body security
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
- 0.15% fail on Drivers
-
0.15% fail on
Load security
- 0.15% fail on Bootlid
-
5.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(38% better than other 1997 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers
- 0.29% fail on Mirrors
- 0.15% fail on Bonnet
- 0.15% fail on Windscreen
-
3.5% fail on
Tyres
(48% better than other 1997 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth (65% better than other 1997 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Steering
-
2.0% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Other components
- 0.29% fail on Operation
- 0.15% fail on Drive system
- 0.15% fail on Rams
-
1.0% fail on
Steering system
(72% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Track rod end
- 0.29% fail on Steering rack
- 0.15% fail on Steering arm
- 0.29% fail on Steering operation
-
2.0% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
-
0.15% fail on
Driving Controls and Speed Limiters
- 0.15% fail on Speed limiter