Jaguar XJ6 MOT Results
Registered in 199565.1% pass rate
from 967 tests in 2017
(18% better than other 1995 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XJ6 is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(29% better than other 1995 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.10% fail on Switch
-
2.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.52% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.52% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.3% fail on
Position lamps
(51% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Front lamps (63% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.10% fail on All position lamps
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(87% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Fog lamp (86% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Horn
-
0.31% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.21% fail on Switch
- 0.10% fail on Lamp
- 0.21% fail on Battery (86% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(34% better than other 1995 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(46% better than other 1995 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Component mounting (51% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.10% fail on Spring mounting
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.6% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.8% fail on Front (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear
- 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.8% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.8% fail on Condition
-
0.93% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(68% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (78% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.21% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
-
0.41% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.41% fail on Condition
-
0.41% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.41% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Drive shafts
(86% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Universal joint (16 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.10% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.10% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(46% better than other 1995 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(27% better than other 1995 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Brake performance
(35% better than other 1995 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.0% fail on Front wheels (69% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.0% fail on
Components
- 3.6% fail on Hoses (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Pipes (50% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.10% fail on Valves
- 0.21% fail on Leaks
- 0.10% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.10% fail on Operation
-
5.0% fail on
Components
-
1.3% fail on
Hub components
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.21% fail on Brake discs
- 0.10% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.72% fail on ABS
-
0.31% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.31% fail on Condition
-
0.31% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.31% fail on
Pedal
- 0.21% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.10% fail on Condition
-
0.31% fail on
Pedal
-
0.31% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.31% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.21% fail on Restricted movement
-
5.3% fail on
Brake performance
(35% better than other 1995 cars)
-
10% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.5% fail on Emissions
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.41% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.21% fail on Pipe
- 0.10% fail on Cap
- 0.10% fail on System
-
7.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.1% fail on Washers
- 2.7% fail on Wipers (43% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Mirrors
- 0.10% fail on Bonnet
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 2.4% fail on Tread depth
- 0.21% fail on Size/type
-
5.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 3.1% fail on Body condition
-
1.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.7% fail on Chassis
-
0.52% fail on
Doors
- 0.21% fail on Drivers
- 0.21% fail on Passengers front
- 0.21% fail on Passengers other
-
0.10% fail on
Seats
- 0.10% fail on Drivers
-
3.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.21% fail on Condition
- 0.10% fail on Requirements
-
0.41% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.41% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.1% fail on
Steering
-
1.8% fail on
Steering system
(55% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Steering rack
- 0.52% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint
- 0.10% fail on Steering arm
-
1.4% fail on
Power steering
(120% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Other components
- 0.21% fail on Operation
- 0.10% fail on Pump
- 0.10% fail on Rams
- 0.21% fail on Steering operation
-
0.10% fail on
Steering control
- 0.10% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.8% fail on
Steering system
(55% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.52% fail on Attachment
-
0.41% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.41% fail on Registration plate